Estimation of mortality rate ratios for chronic conditions with misclassification of disease status at death

Author:

Voß Sabrina,Hoyer Annika,Landwehr Sandra,Pavkov Meda E.,Gregg Edward,Brinks Ralph

Abstract

AbstractEstimation of mortality rates and mortality rate ratios (MRR) of diseased and non-diseased individuals is a core metric of disease impact used in chronic disease epidemiology. Estimation of mortality rates is often conducted through retrospective linkage of information from nationwide surveys such as the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and death registries. These surveys usually collect information on disease status during only one study visit. This infrequency leads to missing disease information (with right censored survival times) for deceased individuals who were disease-free at study participation, and a possibly biased estimation of the MRR because of possible undetected disease onset after study participation. This occurrence is called “misclassification of disease status at death (MicDaD)” and it is a potentially common source of bias in epidemiologic studies. In this study, we conducted a simulation analysis with a high and a low incidence setting to assess the extent of MicDaD-bias in the estimated mortality. For the simulated populations, MRR for diseased and non-diseased individuals with and without MicDaD were calculated and compared. Magnitude of MicDaD-bias depends on and is driven by the incidence of the chronic disease under consideration; our analysis revealed a noticeable shift towards underestimation for high incidences when MicDaD is present. Impact of MicDaD was smaller for lower incidence (but associated with greater uncertainty in the estimation of MRR in general). Further research can consider the amount of missing information and potential influencers such as duration and risk factors of the disease.

Funder

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Private Universität Witten/Herdecke gGmbH

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Informatics,Epidemiology

Reference14 articles.

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes statistics report. 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics-report/diagnosed-undiagnosed-diabetes.html. Accessed 30 Jan 2023.

2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. About the National Health Interview Survey. 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/about_nhis.htm. Accessed 16 May 2022.

3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. National death index. 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ndi/index.htm. Accessed 17 Aug 2022.

4. Binder N, Schumacher M. Missing information caused by death leads to bias in relative risk estimates. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(10):1111–20.

5. Binder N, Blümle A, Balmford J, et al. Cohort studies were found to be frequently biased by missing disease information due to death. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;105:68–79.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3