Estimation of mortality rate ratios for chronic conditions with misclassification of disease status at death
-
Published:2024-01-03
Issue:1
Volume:24
Page:
-
ISSN:1471-2288
-
Container-title:BMC Medical Research Methodology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Med Res Methodol
Author:
Voß Sabrina,Hoyer Annika,Landwehr Sandra,Pavkov Meda E.,Gregg Edward,Brinks Ralph
Abstract
AbstractEstimation of mortality rates and mortality rate ratios (MRR) of diseased and non-diseased individuals is a core metric of disease impact used in chronic disease epidemiology. Estimation of mortality rates is often conducted through retrospective linkage of information from nationwide surveys such as the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and death registries. These surveys usually collect information on disease status during only one study visit. This infrequency leads to missing disease information (with right censored survival times) for deceased individuals who were disease-free at study participation, and a possibly biased estimation of the MRR because of possible undetected disease onset after study participation. This occurrence is called “misclassification of disease status at death (MicDaD)” and it is a potentially common source of bias in epidemiologic studies. In this study, we conducted a simulation analysis with a high and a low incidence setting to assess the extent of MicDaD-bias in the estimated mortality. For the simulated populations, MRR for diseased and non-diseased individuals with and without MicDaD were calculated and compared. Magnitude of MicDaD-bias depends on and is driven by the incidence of the chronic disease under consideration; our analysis revealed a noticeable shift towards underestimation for high incidences when MicDaD is present. Impact of MicDaD was smaller for lower incidence (but associated with greater uncertainty in the estimation of MRR in general). Further research can consider the amount of missing information and potential influencers such as duration and risk factors of the disease.
Funder
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Private Universität Witten/Herdecke gGmbH
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference14 articles.
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes statistics report. 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics-report/diagnosed-undiagnosed-diabetes.html. Accessed 30 Jan 2023.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. About the National Health Interview Survey. 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/about_nhis.htm. Accessed 16 May 2022.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. National death index. 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ndi/index.htm. Accessed 17 Aug 2022.
4. Binder N, Schumacher M. Missing information caused by death leads to bias in relative risk estimates. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(10):1111–20.
5. Binder N, Blümle A, Balmford J, et al. Cohort studies were found to be frequently biased by missing disease information due to death. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;105:68–79.