The judgement of biases included in the category “other bias” in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic survey-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The judgement of biases included in the category “other bias” in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic survey

Published:2019-04-11 Issue:1 Volume:19 Page:
ISSN:1471-2288
Container-title:BMC Medical Research Methodology
language:en
Short-container-title:BMC Med Res Methodol

Author:

Babic Andrija,Pijuk Andela,Brázdilová Lucie,Georgieva Yuliyana,Raposo Pereira Marco António,Poklepovic Pericic Tina,Puljak Livia^ORCID

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Informatics,Epidemiology

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12874-019-0718-8.pdf

Reference16 articles.

1. Gluud LL. Bias in clinical intervention research. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163(6):493–501.

2. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.

3. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Available from https://training.cochrane.org/handbook . Accessed 2 Apr 2019.

4. Roberts C, Torgerson DJ. Understanding controlled trials - baseline imbalance in randomised controlled trials. Br Med J. 1999;319(7203):185.

5. Fu R, Vandermeer BW, Shamliyan TA, O'Neil ME, Yazdi F, Fox SH. AHRQ methods for effective health care: handling continuous outcomes in quantitative synthesis. Methods guide for effectiveness and comparative effectiveness reviews. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008.

Cited by 33 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A scoping review shows that no single existing risk of bias assessment tool considers all sources of bias for cross-sectional studies;Journal of Clinical Epidemiology;2024-08

2. Disagreements in risk of bias assessment for randomized controlled trials in hypertension-related Cochrane reviews;Trials;2024-06-21

3. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool 2 (RoB 2) versus the original RoB: A perspective on the pros and cons;Health Science Reports;2024-06

4. Author instructions in biomedical journals infrequently address systematic review reporting and methodology: a cross-sectional study;Journal of Clinical Epidemiology;2024-02

5. Frequency of use and adequacy of Cochrane risk of bias tool 2 in non‐Cochrane systematic reviews published in 2020: Meta‐research study;Research Synthesis Methods;2024-01-23