Author:
Junge Martin,Krüger Markus,Wahner-Roedler Dietlind L.,Bauer Brent A.,Dörr Marcus,Bahls Martin,Chenot Jean-François,Biffar Reiner,Schmidt Carsten O.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Multimedia multi-device measurement platforms may make the assessment of prevention-related medical variables with a focus on cardiovascular outcomes more attractive and time-efficient. The aim of the studies was to evaluate the reliability (Study 1) and the measurement agreement with a cohort study (Study 2) of selected measures of such a device, the Preventiometer.
Methods
In Study 1 (N = 75), we conducted repeated measurements in two Preventiometers for four examinations (blood pressure measurement, pulse oximetry, body fat measurement, and spirometry) to analyze their agreement and derive (retest-)reliability estimates. In Study 2 (N = 150), we compared somatometry, blood pressure, pulse oximetry, body fat, and spirometry measurements in the Preventiometer with corresponding measurements used in the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP) to evaluate measurement agreement.
Results
Intraclass correlations coefficients (ICCs) ranged from .84 to .99 for all examinations in Study 1. Whereas bias was not an issue for most examinations in Study 2, limits of agreement for most examinations were very large compared to results of similar method comparison studies.
Conclusion
We observed a high retest-reliability of the assessed clinical examinations in the Preventiometer. Some disagreements between Preventiometer and SHIP examinations can be attributed to procedural differences in the examinations. Methodological and technical improvements are recommended before using the Preventiometer in population-based research.
Funder
German Centre of Cardiovascular Research (DZHK)/BMBF
the European Regional Development Fund and the Ministerium für Wirtschaft, Bau und Tourismus
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Informatics,Epidemiology