Author:
Linakis Matthew W.,Van Landingham Cynthia,Gasparini Alessandro,Longnecker Matthew P.
Abstract
AbstractMeta-analysis poses a challenge when original study results have been expressed in a non-uniform manner, such as when regression results from some original studies were based on a log-transformed key independent variable while in others no transformation was used. Methods of re-expressing regression coefficients to generate comparable results across studies regardless of data transformation have recently been developed. We examined the relative bias of three re-expression methods using simulations and 15 real data examples where the independent variable had a skewed distribution. Regression coefficients from models with log-transformed independent variables were re-expressed as though they were based on an untransformed variable. We compared the re-expressed coefficients to those from a model fit to the untransformed variable. In the simulated and real data, all three re-expression methods usually gave biased results, and the skewness of the independent variable predicted the amount of bias. How best to synthesize the results of the log-transformed and absolute exposure evidence streams remains an open question and may depend on the scientific discipline, scale of the outcome, and other considerations.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference37 articles.
1. Higgins JP, Li T, Deeks JJ. Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2019. p. 143–76.
2. Deeks JJ, Higgins JP, Altman DG. Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2023.
3. Allen B, Shao K, Hobbie K, Mendez W, Lee JS, Cote I, et al. Systematic dose-response of environmental epidemiologic studies: Dose and response pre-analysis. Environ Int. 2020;142:105810.
4. National Research Council. Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2009. https://doi.org/10.17226/12209.
5. Campbell M, McKenzie JE, Sowden A, Katikireddi SV, Brennan SE, Ellis S, et al. Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline. BMJ. 2020;368:l6890.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献