Some examples of privacy-preserving sharing of COVID-19 pandemic data with statistical utility evaluation

Author:

Liu Fang,Wang Dong,Yan Tian

Abstract

Abstract Background A considerable amount of various types of data have been collected during the COVID-19 pandemic, the analysis and understanding of which have been indispensable for curbing the spread of the disease. As the pandemic moves to an endemic state, the data collected during the pandemic will continue to be rich sources for further studying and understanding the impacts of the pandemic on various aspects of our society. On the other hand, naïve release and sharing of the information can be associated with serious privacy concerns. Methods We use three common but distinct data types collected during the pandemic (case surveillance tabular data, case location data, and contact tracing networks) to illustrate the publication and sharing of granular information and individual-level pandemic data in a privacy-preserving manner. We leverage and build upon the concept of differential privacy to generate and release privacy-preserving data for each data type. We investigate the inferential utility of privacy-preserving information through simulation studies at different levels of privacy guarantees and demonstrate the approaches in real-life data. All the approaches employed in the study are straightforward to apply. Results The empirical studies in all three data cases suggest that privacy-preserving results based on the differentially privately sanitized data can be similar to the original results at a reasonably small privacy loss ($$\epsilon \approx 1$$ ϵ 1 ). Statistical inferences based on sanitized data using the multiple synthesis technique also appear valid, with nominal coverage of 95% confidence intervals when there is no noticeable bias in point estimation. When $$\epsilon <1$$ ϵ < 1  and the sample size is not large enough, some privacy-preserving results are subject to bias, partially due to the bounding applied to sanitized data as a post-processing step to satisfy practical data constraints. Conclusions Our study generates statistical evidence on the practical feasibility of sharing pandemic data with privacy guarantees and on how to balance the statistical utility of released information during this process.

Funder

National Science Foundation

University of Notre Dame Asia Research Collaboration Grant

China Scholarships Council program

National Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Informatics,Epidemiology

Reference63 articles.

1. $$5$$Lab. COVID-19 News Tracker-Location-based news about COVID-19 in Thailand. 2020. https://covidtracker.5lab.co/zh-hans?fbclid=IwAR1bAH4qDAZtWkdh2MVwAiFmow9lAtRFg78-vPSZKr76__ezADDlBNwYHTyk. Accessed 17 May 2020.

2. Aktay A, Bavadekar S, Cossoul G, Davis J, Desfontaines D, Fabrikant A, et al. Google COVID-19 community mobility reports: Anonymization process description (version 1.0). 2020. arXiv:2004.04145.

3. Andrés ME, Bordenabe NE, Chatzikokolakis K, Palamidessi C. Geo-indistinguishability: differential privacy for location-based systems. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGSAC conference on Computer & communications security. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2013. p. 901–14.

4. Apple, Google. Privacy-Preserving Contact Tracing. 2020. https://covid19.apple.com/contacttracing/. Accessed 23 May 2021.

5. Apple. Apple Differential Privacy Technical Overview. 2020. https://www.apple.com/privacy/docs/Differential_Privacy_Overview.pdf. Accessed 13 June 20221.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3