Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Social media has led to fundamental changes in the way that people look for and share health related information. There is increasing interest in using this spontaneously generated patient experience data as a data source for health research. The aim was to summarise the state of the art regarding how and why SGOPE data has been used in health research. We determined the sites and platforms used as data sources, the purposes of the studies, the tools and methods being used, and any identified research gaps.
Methods
A scoping umbrella review was conducted looking at review papers from 2015 to Jan 2021 that studied the use of SGOPE data for health research. Using keyword searches we identified 1759 papers from which we included 58 relevant studies in our review.
Results
Data was used from many individual general or health specific platforms, although Twitter was the most widely used data source. The most frequent purposes were surveillance based, tracking infectious disease, adverse event identification and mental health triaging. Despite the developments in machine learning the reviews included lots of small qualitative studies. Most NLP used supervised methods for sentiment analysis and classification. Very early days, methods need development. Methods not being explained. Disciplinary differences - accuracy tweaks vs application. There is little evidence of any work that either compares the results in both methods on the same data set or brings the ideas together.
Conclusion
Tools, methods, and techniques are still at an early stage of development, but strong consensus exists that this data source will become very important to patient centred health research.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Informatics,Epidemiology
Reference83 articles.
1. Kemp S. Digital 2019: Q4 Global Digital Statshot [Internet]. DataReportal – Global Digital Insights. 2019. [cited 2022 May 10]. Available from: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2019-q4-global-digital-statshot.
2. Fox S. The social life of health information. Pew Research Center. 2014; [cited 2017 Aug 12]. Available from: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/01/15/the-social-life-of-health-information/.
3. Mueller J, Jay C, Harper S, Davies A, Vega J, Todd C. Web Use for Symptom Appraisal of Physical Health Conditions: A Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(6):e202 [cited 2017 Jul 29]. jmir.org.
4. Vicari S, Cappai F. Health activism and the logic of connective action. A case study of rare disease patient organisations. Inf Commun Soc. 2016;19(11):1653–71.
5. Oprescu F, Campo S, Lowe J, Andsager J, Morcuende JA. Online information exchanges for parents of children with a rare health condition: key findings from an online support community. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(1):e16.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献