Author:
Fernandez-Felix Borja M.,López-Alcalde Jesus,Roqué Marta,Muriel Alfonso,Zamora Javier
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Systematic reviews of studies of clinical prediction models are becoming increasingly abundant in the literature. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment are critical steps in any systematic review. CHARMS and PROBAST are the standard tools used for these steps in these reviews of clinical prediction models.
Results
We developed an Excel template for data extraction and risk of bias assessment of clinical prediction models including both recommended tools. The template makes it easier for reviewers to extract data, to assess the risk of bias and applicability, and to produce results tables and figures ready for publication.
Conclusion
We hope this template will simplify and standardize the process of conducting a systematic review of prediction models, and promote a better and more comprehensive reporting of these systematic reviews.
Funder
Instituto de Salud Carlos III
CIBER
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Informatics,Epidemiology
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献