Abstract
Abstract
Background
Propensity score weighting is a useful tool to make causal or unconfounded comparisons between groups. According to the definition by the Institute of Medicine (IOM), estimates of health care disparities should be adjusted for health-status factors but not for socioeconomic status (SES) variables. There have been attempts to use propensity score weighting to generate estimates that are concordant with IOM’s definition. However, the existing propensity score methods do not preserve SES distributions in minority and majority groups unless SES variables are independent of health status variables.
Methods
The present study introduces a deweighting method that uses two types of propensity scores. One is a function of all covariates of health status and SES variables and is used to weight study subjects to adjust for them. The other is a function of only the SES variables and is used to deweight the subjects to preserve the original SES distributions.
Results
The procedure of deweighting is illustrated using a dataset from a right heart catheterization (RHC) study, where it was used to examine whether there was a disparity between black and white patients in receiving RHC. The empirical example provided promising evidence that the deweighting method successfully preserved the marginal SES distributions for both racial groups but balanced the conditional distributions of health status given SES.
Conclusions
Deweighting is a promising tool for implementing the IOM-definition of health care disparities. The method is expected to be broadly applied to quantitative research on health care disparities.
Funder
National Cancer Institute
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. Jackson JW, VanderWeele TJ. Decomposition analysis to identify intervention targets for reducing disparities. Epidemiology. 2018;29:825–35.
2. Ben-Michael E, Feller A, Kelz R, Keele L. Estimating Racial Disparities in Emergency General Surgery. 2023. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.04321.
3. Unequal Treatment. Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care (with CD). Washington, D.C: National Academies Press; 2003.
4. Duan N, Meng X, Lin JY, Chen C, Alegria M. Disparities in defining disparities: statistical conceptual frameworks. Stat Med. 2008;27:3941–56.
5. Cook BL, McGuire TG, Meara E, Zaslavsky AM. Adjusting for health status in non-linear models of health care disparities. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2009;9:1–21.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献