Author:
Chen Yifu,Hao Lucy,Zou Vito Z.,Hollander Zsuzsanna,Ng Raymond T.,Isaac Kathryn V.
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundManually extracted data points from health records are collated on an institutional, provincial, and national level to facilitate clinical research. However, the labour-intensive clinical chart review process puts an increasing burden on healthcare system budgets. Therefore, an automated information extraction system is needed to ensure the timeliness and scalability of research data.MethodsWe used a dataset of 100 synoptic operative and 100 pathology reports, evenly split into 50 reports in training and test sets for each report type. The training set guided our development of a Natural Language Processing (NLP) extraction pipeline system, which accepts scanned images of operative and pathology reports. The system uses a combination of rule-based and transfer learning methods to extract numeric encodings from text. We also developed visualization tools to compare the manual and automated extractions. The code for this paper was made available on GitHub.ResultsA test set of 50 operative and 50 pathology reports were used to evaluate the extraction accuracies of the NLP pipeline. Gold standard, defined as manual extraction by expert reviewers, yielded accuracies of 90.5% for operative reports and 96.0% for pathology reports, while the NLP system achieved overall 91.9% (operative) and 95.4% (pathology) accuracy. The pipeline successfully extracted outcomes data pertinent to breast cancer tumor characteristics (e.g. presence of invasive carcinoma, size, histologic type), prognostic factors (e.g. number of lymph nodes with micro-metastases and macro-metastases, pathologic stage), and treatment-related variables (e.g. margins, neo-adjuvant treatment, surgical indication) with high accuracy. Out of the 48 variables across operative and pathology codebooks, NLP yielded 43 variables with F-scores of at least 0.90; in comparison, a trained human annotator yielded 44 variables with F-scores of at least 0.90.ConclusionsThe NLP system achieves near-human-level accuracy in both operative and pathology reports using a minimal curated dataset. This system uniquely provides a robust solution for transparent, adaptable, and scalable automation of data extraction from patient health records. It may serve to advance breast cancer clinical research by facilitating collection of vast amounts of valuable health data at a population level.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Informatics,Epidemiology
Reference38 articles.
1. Canadian Cancer Society, Statistics Canada, Public Health Agency of Canada. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2019. 2019. https://cdn.cancer.ca/-/media/files/research/cancer-statistics/2019-statistics/canadian-cancer-statistics-2019-en.pdf. Accessed 1 Apr 2020.
2. Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Canadian Institute for Health Information. Breast Cancer Surgery in Canada, 2007-2008 to 2009-2010. 2012. https://publications.gc.ca/site/archivee-archived.html?https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2012/icis-cihi/H115-61-2010-eng.pdf. Accessed 4 Apr 2020.
3. Bray F, McCarron P, Parkin DM. The changing global patterns of female breast cancer incidence and mortality. Breast Cancer Res. 2004;6:229–39.
4. Economic Burden of Illness in Canada, 2010, Public Health Agency of Canada. http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/ebic-femc/index- eng.php, Accessed 1 Apr 2020.
5. Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000-14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet. 2018;391:1023–75.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献