Abstract
AbstractHeritage conservation in urban areas involves complex systems often faced with the dilemmas of maintaining the built form’s historical character, improving infrastructure, and managing development through stakeholder cooperation. At present, the performance of any conservation project is solely vested in conserving the built fabric. Evaluation tools for urban heritage conservation projects do not have provisions for measuring the subjective value of stakeholders who are part of the heritage setting. This study tries to identify and prioritise the factors that need to be considered when developing a conservation project performance assessment model for an urban heritage conservation project from the perspective of experts that can be further evaluated from the perspective of stakeholders. As these complex systems can be better viewed in the context of developing countries, the case of India is adopted. From a literature review, factors that contribute to the outcome of an urban heritage conservation project were identified and categorised into six aspects: the physical, social, economic, cultural, political, and continuity aspects. Through an expert survey, the factors that constituted each aspect were filtered using the feature selection method of correlation to avoid factors that may seem related. The factors under each aspect were ranked using a weighted average ranking method to identify the most prioritised factors determining the outcome of an urban heritage conservation project. The priority weights of the aspects were calculated using Saaty’s analytic hierarchy process. The results show that the cultural aspect was the most important aspect, followed by the continuity aspect. The social and physical aspects were prioritised similarly, followed by the economic and political aspects. This study is distinctive because it identifies the influential factors that can help develop a conservation project performance assessment model for an urban heritage conservation project.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference44 articles.
1. Abdurahiman, Shahim, and A. K. Kasthurba. 2022. Urban conservation of heritage-sensitive zones in India: A methodological approach. In Conservation of architectural heritage, edited by Antonella Versaci, Hocine Bougdah, and Natsuko Akagawa, 281–289. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74482-3_22
2. Adishakti, Laretna T. 2010. Managing historic cities: Management of continuity admits change. Paper presented at the workshop 3: Heritage and development: Managing historic cities, in the Fourth ASEM CULTURAL MINISTERS MEETING "Heritage and the challenges of the present”, Poznan, Poland, September 8–10
3. Amin, Hanaw M. T. M., and Emmanuel Akwasi Adu-Ampong. 2016. Challenges to urban cultural heritage conservation and management in the historic centre of Sulaimaniyah, Kurdistan-Iraq. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development 6 (3): 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-03-2016-0019.
4. AustraliaI COMOS. 1999. Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS charter for places of cultural significance 1999. Burwood: Australia ICOMOS.
5. Basu, Asmita, and Anupam De. 2021. Heritage valuation driving sustainability of cultural capital in Bishnupur in Eastern India. PlLURAL History. Culture. Society. Journal of History and Geography Department 9 (1): 103–115. https://doi.org/10.37710/PLURAL.V9I1S_7.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献