Ethical framework and inclusivity: research mechanics of difficult-to-reach migrants in civil military context

Author:

Ullah A. K. M. AhsanORCID

Abstract

AbstractIn the midst of humanitarian crises, understanding and helping hard-to-reach migrant communities, is a major challenge for researchers. This article addresses the ethical framework and dimensions of inclusivity associated with researching such populations in civilian-military setting. With the overarching aim of improving methodological discourse, this study seeks to understand the mechanisms involved in working with crisis-affected migrants who are often marginalised and geographically isolated. The significance of this research lies in its multi-layered approach to understanding the ethical considerations and inclusivity that are essential to conducting research in crisis situations. By examining existing theories in the field, including participatory research methods, ethnographic studies and community-based research frameworks, this study critically evaluates their applicability in the context of crisis-affected migrant communities. This research contributes to methodological approaches by proposing innovative strategies that emphasise ethical integrity, cultural sensitivity and inclusivity. It argues for the development of collaborative and culturally sensitive research practises that enable migrant communities to actively participate in the research process and ensure that their voices are heard, and their perspectives accurately represented. This study contributes to existing knowledge by illuminating the complexities of researching hard-to-reach migrant communities in civil military setting. This study provides researchers and practitioners with the necessary tools and perspectives required for engaging with crisis-affected migrant communities in a manner that is both ethical, respectful, and impactful.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference126 articles.

1. Ahmad N et al (2019) Inclusive research: Closing the gap between public and policy makers. Sage Open 9(4):1–10

2. Baker R, Cummings J, Rehman M (2018) Refugee Integration and Social Cohesion: A Review of Global Policies. J Migr Dev 6(2):101–117.  Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/21632324.2018.1431234

3. Barnett M, Chopra T, Weiss TG (2017) Humanitarianism Contested: Where Angels Fear to Tread. Routledge, London & New York

4. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (2019) Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

5. Betts A, Collier P (2017) Refuge: Transforming a Broken Refugee System. Penguin, New York

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3