Abstract
AbstractAssuming that higher education has a role in the professionalisation of humanitarianism, this article discusses humanitarian work as a subject in higher education. The Network on Humanitarian Action (NOHA) joint master’s programme in International Humanitarian Action is used as a case study for understanding the challenges and potentials in teaching the subject. Teaching challenges are discussed in relation to three themes: interdisciplinary, work-integrated learning and intercultural competencies. These themes are an integrated part of the professionalisation of humanitarian work, since they concern how humanitarian action should be understood and implemented. The NOHA joint master’s programme incorporates a variety of approaches, such as student mobility and a range of courses, to strengthen the student’s education in each of these themes. The last part of the article discusses the future prospects of the programme in response to trends that affect higher education: online teaching and rapid technological change. It is argued that the NOHA network and the NOHA joint master’s programme are well positioned to navigate these trends and continue to be relevant for educating humanitarian professionals.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. Barnett M (2011) Empire of humanity: a history of humanitarianism. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
2. Black HT, Duhon DL (2006) Assessing the impact of business study abroad programs on cultural awareness and personal development. J Educ Business 81(3):140–144
3. Einarsdóttir J, Churruca Muguruza C, Voutira E, Hristova P (2014) Emerging trends in humanitarian action and professionalization of humanitarian aid workers. EUPRHA
4. Faber M, Westerheijden D (2011) “European degree structure and national reform: constitutive dynamics of the Bologna process” in Enders J, de Boer H.F., Westerheijden D.F. (eds.) Reform of Higher Education in Europe. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, p 11–18
5. Haas BW (2018) The impact of study abroad on improved cultural awareness: a quantitative review. Intercultural Educ (london, England) 29(5–6):571–588