Quality of vital event data for infant mortality estimation in prospective, population-based studies: an analysis of secondary data from Asia, Africa, and Latin America

Author:

Erchick Daniel J.,Subedi Seema,Verhulst Andrea,Guillot Michel,Adair Linda S.,Barros Aluísio J. D.,Chasekwa Bernard,Christian Parul,da Silva Bruna Gonçalves C.,Silveira Mariângela F.,Hallal Pedro C.,Humphrey Jean H.,Huybregts Lieven,Kariuki Simon,Khatry Subarna K.,Lachat Carl,Matijasevich Alicia,McElroy Peter D.,Menezes Ana Maria B.,Mullany Luke C.,Perez Tita Lorna L.,Phillips-Howard Penelope A.,Roberfroid Dominique,Santos Iná S.,ter Kuile Feiko O.,Ravilla Thulasiraj D.,Tielsch James M.,Wu Lee S. F.,Katz Joanne

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Infant and neonatal mortality estimates are typically derived from retrospective birth histories collected through surveys in countries with unreliable civil registration and vital statistics systems. Yet such data are subject to biases, including under-reporting of deaths and age misreporting, which impact mortality estimates. Prospective population-based cohort studies are an underutilized data source for mortality estimation that may offer strengths that avoid biases. Methods We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group, including 11 population-based pregnancy or birth cohort studies, to evaluate the appropriateness of vital event data for mortality estimation. Analyses were descriptive, summarizing study designs, populations, protocols, and internal checks to assess their impact on data quality. We calculated infant and neonatal morality rates and compared patterns with Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data. Results Studies yielded 71,760 pregnant women and 85,095 live births. Specific field protocols, especially pregnancy enrollment, limited exclusion criteria, and frequent follow-up visits after delivery, led to higher birth outcome ascertainment and fewer missing deaths. Most studies had low follow-up loss in pregnancy and the first month with little evidence of date heaping. Among studies in Asia and Latin America, neonatal mortality rates (NMR) were similar to DHS, while several studies in Sub-Saharan Africa had lower NMRs than DHS. Infant mortality varied by study and region between sources. Conclusions Prospective, population-based cohort studies following rigorous protocols can yield high-quality vital event data to improve characterization of detailed mortality patterns of infants in low- and middle-income countries, especially in the early neonatal period where mortality risk is highest and changes rapidly.

Funder

National Institute for Child Health and Human Development

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

National Institute for Child Health and Human Development, NICHD

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Epidemiology

Reference36 articles.

1. United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UN IGME). Levels & trends in child mortality: report 2020, estimates developed by the United Nations Inter-Agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. United Nations Children’s Fund; 2020.

2. Mikkelsen L, Phillips DE, AbouZahr C, et al. A global assessment of civil registration and vital statistics systems: monitoring data quality and progress. Lancet Lond Engl. 2015;386(10001):1395–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60171-4.

3. United Nations Statistics Division. Quality of vital statistics obtained from civil registration. United Nations https://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic-social/crvs/

4. Guillot M, Gerland P, Pelletier F, Saabneh A. Child mortality estimation: a global overview of infant and child mortality age patterns in light of new empirical data. PLOS Med. 2012;9(8):e1001299. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001299.

5. Guillot M, Prieto J, Verhulst A, Gerland P. Modeling age patterns of under-5 mortality: results from a log-quadratic model applied to high-quality vital registration data. Published online August 31, 2020.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3