A field-experiment testing the impact of a warrant service prioritization strategy for police patrol officers

Author:

Taniguchi Travis A.ORCID,Aagaard Brian,Baumgartner Peter,Young Amanda R.

Abstract

AbstractThe objective of this experiment was to test the efficacy of providing prioritized warrant lists to patrol officers. A field experiment was carried out with the Greensboro (NC) Police Department. Warrant risk profiles were calculated from an analysis of historical offending; historical risk factors were used to implement prospective risk assessment for committing a violent crime while having an outstanding warrant issued during the field experiment. During the period from March 01, through July 31, 2019, people with warrants were randomly allocated to treatment or control. Outcomes included: number of warrants served, time to service, and average risk score of warrants served. Prioritization was not effective in promoting additional warrant service. No differences were found in the risk scores of people served. However, assessment of time to service suggested that warrants were served more quickly during the experimental period. Implementation of warrant prioritization had limited impacts; the process evaluation demonstrated the difficulty in modifying police patrol behaviors.

Funder

National Institute of Justice

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Urban Studies,Cultural Studies,Safety Research

Reference53 articles.

1. Bar-Gill, O., & Friedman, B. (2012). Taking warrants seriously. Northwestern University Law Review, 106(4), 1609–1674.

2. Beckett, L. (2020). Minneapolis public school board votes to terminate its contract with police. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/01/minneapolis-public-school-end-police-contract.

3. Bernal, D. (2017). Taking the court to the people: real-world solutions for nonappearance. Arizona Law Review, 59, 547–571.

4. Bierie, D. M. (2014). Fugitives in the United States. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(4), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.04.005

5. Bierie, D. M. (2015). National public registry of active warrants: a policy proposal. Federal Probation, 79(1), 27–30.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3