Abstract
Abstract
Background
Native tissue cystocele repair has been the cornerstone of prolapse surgery, especially since the learned societies warned clinicians and patients about serious mesh-related complications. Surgical techniques mainly consist in anterior colporraphy and vaginal patch plastron. However, success rates of native tissue cystocele repair are heterogeneous, depending on the design of studies and definition of outcomes. To date, high-quality data comparing vaginal native tissue procedures are still lacking.
Methods
Herein we aimed to describe the design of the first randomized controlled trial (TAPP) comparing anterior colporraphy (plication of the muscularis and adventitial layers of the vaginal wall) and vaginal patch plastron (bladder support anchored on the tendinous arch of the pelvic fascia by lateral sutures) techniques.
Our aim is to assess the effectiveness of vaginal native tissue repair at 1 year for cystocele with a combined definition of success—anatomic and functional. The primary endpoint will be the success rate 1 year after surgery with a composite of objective and subjective measures (Aa and Ba points < 0 from POP-Q (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System) and a negative answer to question 3 of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and no need for additional treatment).
Discussion
A prospective study has found a success rate at 35% for anterior colporraphy based on a combined definition, both anatomic and functional, as recently recommended. However, the definition of anatomic was strict (POP-Q< 2), while it seems that the best definition of anatomic success is “no prolapse among the hymen”, that is to say Aa and Ba points from the POP-Q classification < 0. We hypothesize that vaginal patch plastron will have a better anatomic and functional success comparatively to anterior colporraphy because native tissue is added, as it corrects both median and lateral cystoceles thanks to bilateral paravaginal suspension.
Trial registration
CHU LIMOGES is the sponsor of this research (n°87RI18_0013).
This research is supported by the French Department of Health (PHRC 2018-A03476-49) and will be conducted with the support of DGOS (PHRC interregional – GIRCI SOHO).
The study protocol was approved by the Human Subjects Protection Review Board (Comité de Protection des Personnes) on May 16, 2019.
The trial is registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT03875989).
Funder
Direction Générale de l’offre de Soins
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference23 articles.
1. Le Normand L, Cosson M, Cour F, Deffieux X, Donon L, Ferry P, et al. Clinical practice guidelines: synthesis of the guidelines for the surgical treatment of primary pelvic organ prolapse in women by the AFU, CNGOF, SIFUD-PP, SNFCP, and SCGP. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017;46(5):387–91.
2. HAS. Evaluation des implants de renfort pour le traitement de l’incontinence urinaire d’effort fémnine et du pralpasus des organes pelviens chez la femme. 2007.
3. FDA. Urogynecologic mesh: update on the safety and effectiveness of the transvaginal placement for pelvic organ prolapse. 2011.
4. CNGOF. Communiqué de Presse: Chirurgie des prolapsus génitaux et de l’incontinence urinaire. 2018.
5. Savary D, Bruyere A, Campagne Loiseau S, Jacquetin B. Chirurgie de la cystocèle par voie vaginale: techniques sans prothèse. CNGOF. 2012.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献