Abstract
Abstract
Background
Community-Based Sociotherapy (CBS) is an approach that was introduced in Rwanda in 2005, with the aim of improving psychosocial well-being among its participants and facilitating reconciliation processes. Over the years, CBS has been adapted contextually and the effectiveness of the approach has been measured in different ways, using qualitative and quantitative study designs. This study specifically assesses the effectiveness of CBS in terms of fostering the social dignity of participants as the primary outcome.
Methods/design
A cluster randomized controlled trial design with person-level outcomes whereas the CBS treatment is delivered at the cluster level. A total of 1200 eligible participants will be randomly assigned to two groups in a 1:1 ratio. Participants in the intervention group will receive the CBS intervention, while the control group will be waitlisted. The primary outcome measure is a self-designed and psychometrically validated Social Dignity Scale. The secondary outcome measures will be the WHO (Five) Well-Being Index (WHO-5), the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), the Self-reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20), and the perceived parental self-efficacy scale. The primary analysis will be performed following an intention to treat analysis, using generalized estimating equation modeling.
Discussion
We expect this cluster randomized controlled trial to provide insight into the effectiveness of CBS on social dignity and secondary psychosocial outcomes among its group participants, who have different socio-historical backgrounds including genocide survivors, perpetrators, bystanders and their descendants, people in conflicts (family/community), and local leaders. This study will inform CBS implementers, policymakers, practitioners, and other stakeholders on the role of social dignity in interventions that focus on psychosocial healing.
Trial registration
ISRCTN ISRCTN11199072. It was registered on 2 April 2022.
Funder
community Based Sociotherapy
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference49 articles.
1. United Nations Office on Genocide Prevention. United Nations Office on Genocide Prevention and the Responsibility to Protect [Internet]. 2011. p. 1–8. Available from: https://www.un.org/en/preventgenocide/adviser/pdf/framework/of/analysis/for/atrocity/crimes_en.pdf. https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/crimes-against-humanity.shtml.
2. United Nations. Outreach Programme on the 1994 Genocide Against the Tutsi in Rwanda and the United Nations [Internet]. United Nations. 2022. Available from: https://www.un.org/en/preventgenocide/rwanda/historical-background.shtml
3. Lindert J, Kawachi I, Knobler HY, Abramowitz MZ, Galea S, Roberts B, et al. The long-term health consequences of genocide: developing GESQUQ - a genocide studies checklist. Confl Health. 2019;13:14. Available from: https://conflictandhealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13031-019-0198-9.
4. Ng LC, Ahishakiye N, Miller DE, Meyerowitz BE. Life after genocide: mental health, education, and social support of orphaned survivors. Int Perspect Psychol. 2015;4:83–97. Available from: https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1037/ipp0000031.
5. Ministère de l’Administration Locale du Développement Communautaire et des Affaires Sociales. Dénombrement des victimes du génocide. Kigali, Rwanda; 2004.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献