PLUS-IS-LESS project: Procalcitonin and Lung UltraSonography-based antibiotherapy in patients with Lower rESpiratory tract infection in Swiss Emergency Departments: study protocol for a pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial
Author:
Bessat CécileORCID, Bingisser Roland, Schwendinger Markus, Bulaty Tim, Fournier Yvan, Della Santa Vincent, Pfeil Magali, Schwab Dominique, Leuppi Jörg D., Geigy Nicolas, Steuer Stephan, Roos Friedemann, Christ Michael, Sirova Adriana, Espejo Tanguy, Riedel Henk, Atzl Alexandra, Napieralski Fabian, Marti Joachim, Cisco Giulio, Foley Rose-Anna, Schindler Melinée, Hartley Mary-Anne, Fayet Aurélie, Garcia Elena, Locatelli Isabella, Albrich Werner C., Hugli Olivier, Boillat-Blanco Noémie, , Boillat-Blanco Noémie, Albrich Werner C., Garin Nicolas, Mattsson Björn, Gasser Stephan, Von Ow Dieter
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) are among the most frequent infections and a significant contributor to inappropriate antibiotic prescription. Currently, no single diagnostic tool can reliably identify bacterial pneumonia. We thus evaluate a multimodal approach based on a clinical score, lung ultrasound (LUS), and the inflammatory biomarker, procalcitonin (PCT) to guide prescription of antibiotics. LUS outperforms chest X-ray in the identification of pneumonia, while PCT is known to be elevated in bacterial and/or severe infections. We propose a trial to test their synergistic potential in reducing antibiotic prescription while preserving patient safety in emergency departments (ED).
Methods
The PLUS-IS-LESS study is a pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster-randomized, clinical trial conducted in 10 Swiss EDs. It assesses the PLUS algorithm, which combines a clinical prediction score, LUS, PCT, and a clinical severity score to guide antibiotics among adults with LRTIs, compared with usual care. The co-primary endpoints are the proportion of patients prescribed antibiotics and the proportion of patients with clinical failure by day 28. Secondary endpoints include measurement of change in quality of life, length of hospital stay, antibiotic-related side effects, barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the algorithm, cost-effectiveness of the intervention, and identification of patterns of pneumonia in LUS using machine learning.
Discussion
The PLUS algorithm aims to optimize prescription of antibiotics through improved diagnostic performance and maximization of physician adherence, while ensuring safety. It is based on previously validated tests and does therefore not expose participants to unforeseeable risks. Cluster randomization prevents cross-contamination between study groups, as physicians are not exposed to the intervention during or before the control period. The stepped-wedge implementation of the intervention allows effect calculation from both between- and within-cluster comparisons, which enhances statistical power and allows smaller sample size than a parallel cluster design. Moreover, it enables the training of all centers for the intervention, simplifying implementation if the results prove successful.
The PLUS algorithm has the potential to improve the identification of LRTIs that would benefit from antibiotics. When scaled, the expected reduction in the proportion of antibiotics prescribed has the potential to not only decrease side effects and costs but also mitigate antibiotic resistance.
Trial registration
This study was registered on July 19, 2022, on the ClinicalTrials.gov registry using reference number: NCT05463406.
Trial status
Recruitment started on December 5, 2022, and will be completed on November 3, 2024. Current protocol version is version 3.0, dated April 3, 2023.
Funder
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung University of Lausanne
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Federal Office of Public Health FOPH. Swiss Antibiotic Resistance Report 2018. Usage of antibiotics and occurrence of antibiotic resistance in bacteria from humans and animals in Switzerland. 2018-OEG-87. 2. Burk M, El-Kersh K, Saad M, Wiemken T, Ramirez J, Cavallazzi R. Viral infection in community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir Rev. 2016;25(140):178–88. 3. Ieven M, Coenen S, Loens K, Lammens C, Coenjaerts F, Vanderstraeten A, et al. Aetiology of lower respiratory tract infection in adults in primary care: a prospective study in 11 European countries. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24(11):1158–63. 4. Woodhead M, Blasi F, Ewig S, Garau J, Huchon G, Ieven M, et al. Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections - full version. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17:E1-59. 5. Metlay JP. Does this patient have community-acquired pneumonia? Diagnosing pneumonia by history and physical examination. JAMA: J Am Med Assoc. 1997;278(17):1440–5.
|
|