PRagMatic Pediatric Trial of Balanced vs nOrmaL Saline FlUid in Sepsis: study protocol for the PRoMPT BOLUS randomized interventional trial
Author:
Weiss Scott L.ORCID, Balamuth Fran, Long Elliot, Thompson Graham C., Hayes Katie L., Katcoff Hannah, Cook Marlena, Tsemberis Elena, Hickey Christopher P., Williams Amanda, Williamson-Urquhart Sarah, Borland Meredith L., Dalziel Stuart R., Gelbart Ben, Freedman Stephen B., Babl Franz E., Huang Jing, Kuppermann Nathan, Long E., Williams A., Babl F., Borland M., O’Brien S., Craig S., Ramaga E., Kochar A., Nivea G., Jani S., Thosar D., Rao A., Phillips N., George S., Lithgow A., Mitchell C., Thompson G., Freedman S., Williamson-Urquhart S., Gilad E., Cooke S., Judge P., Murthy S., Kissoon N., Alqurashi W., Alnaji F., Sangha G., Mater A., Brashaw M., Curtis S., Joffe A., Shayan Y., Tucci M., Gripp K., Berthelot S., Weiss M., Davis A., Guifoyle E., Moretti M., Kam A., Parker M., Rochwerg B., Emsley J., Verma N., Sehgal A., Dalziel S., Bonisch M., Tan E., Neutze J., Balamuth F., Weiss S., Tsemberis E., Huang J., Cook M., Katcoff H., Hayes K., Hickey C., Eisenberg M., Lewander D., Morris C., Hurley D., Baumer-Mouradian S., Ambroggio L., Grice K., Festekjian A., Hickey B., Sada R., Dodson J., Badawy M., Lebel C., Elliott M., Koutralis I., Hom K., Eckerle M., Singleton M., Rogers A., Cervantes V., Duffy S., Bahamon I., Alpern L., Sirizi A., Ahmad A. Haider, Banegas A. Rubi, Lloyd J., DiCostanzo K., Kwok M., Ochs J., Lane R., Harbour T., Uspal N., Cappetto K., Clukies L., Robinsonm D., McManemy J., Gonzales V., Vance C., Kupperman N., Pimenta K., Mansour K., Lavrisha L., Ramirez M., Grad J.,
Abstract
Abstract
Background/aims
Despite evidence that preferential use of balanced/buffered fluids may improve outcomes compared with chloride-rich 0.9% saline, saline remains the most commonly used fluid for children with septic shock. We aim to determine if resuscitation with balanced/buffered fluids as part of usual care will improve outcomes, in part through reduced kidney injury and without an increase in adverse effects, compared to 0.9% saline for children with septic shock.
Methods
The Pragmatic Pediatric Trial of Balanced versus Normal Saline Fluid in Sepsis (PRoMPT BOLUS) study is an international, open-label pragmatic interventional trial being conducted at > 40 sites in the USA, Canada, and Australia/New Zealand starting on August 25, 2020, and continuing for 5 years. Children > 6 months to < 18 years treated for suspected septic shock with abnormal perfusion in an emergency department will be randomized to receive either balanced/buffered crystalloids (intervention) or 0.9% saline (control) for initial resuscitation and maintenance fluids for up to 48 h. Eligible patients are enrolled and randomized using serially numbered, opaque envelopes concurrent with clinical care. Given the life-threatening nature of septic shock and narrow therapeutic window to start fluid resuscitation, patients may be enrolled under “exception from informed consent” in the USA or “deferred consent” in Canada and Australia/New Zealand. Other than fluid type, all decisions about timing, volume, and rate of fluid administration remain at the discretion of the treating clinicians. For pragmatic reasons, clinicians will not be blinded to study fluid type. Anticipated enrollment is 8800 patients. The primary outcome will be major adverse kidney events within 30 days (MAKE30), a composite of death, renal replacement therapy, and persistent kidney dysfunction. Additional effectiveness, safety, and biologic outcomes will also be analyzed.
Discussion
PRoMPT BOLUS will provide high-quality evidence for the comparative effectiveness of buffered/balanced crystalloids versus 0.9% saline for the initial fluid management of children with suspected septic shock in emergency settings.
Trial registration
PRoMPT BOLUS was first registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04102371) on September 25, 2019. Enrollment started on August 25, 2020.
Funder
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Department of Public Health, Pennsylvania Canadian Institutes of Health Research Medical Research Futures Fund International Clinical Trial Collaboration
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference52 articles.
1. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D, Kievlan DR, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020;395(10219):200–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7. 2. Karakala N, Raghunathan K, Shaw AD. Intravenous fluids in sepsis: what to use and what to avoid. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2013;19(6):537–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000028. 3. Myburgh JA, Mythen MG. Resuscitation fluids. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(13):1243–51. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1208627. 4. Annane D, Siami S, Jaber S, Martin C, Elatrous S, Declere AD, et al. Effects of fluid resuscitation with colloids vs crystalloids on mortality in critically ill patients presenting with hypovolemic shock: the CRISTAL randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;310(17):1809–17. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.280502. 5. Raghunathan K, Shaw A, Nathanson B, Sturmer T, Brookhart A, Stefan MS, et al. Association between the choice of IV crystalloid and in-hospital mortality among critically ill adults with sepsis*. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(7):1585–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000000305.
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|