Abstract
Abstract
Background
Diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) is the most common subtype of IBS. Acupuncture is commonly used to treat IBS-D, but its effect is uncertain because of the poor quality of prior studies. This trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture treatment for IBS-D through comparisons with sham acupuncture.
Methods/design
This is a large-scale, multi-center, randomized, two-arm interventional clinical trial. Participants will take part in a total of 20 weeks of study, which contained 3 phases: 2-week screening, 6-week treatment, and 12-week follow-up. Based on the composite response rate of the primary endpoint in our pilot study (a sham acupuncture response rate of 27% and a true acupuncture of approximately 45%), 280 randomly allocated participants were planned. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to the true acupuncture group and sham acupuncture group according to a ratio of 1:1, and a total of 15 sessions of treatment overall 6-week treatment period will be brought. The primary endpoint is a composite response rate at week 6, and the responder is defined as who responses in both abdominal pain intensity and stool consistency. Furthermore, composite response rates at other weeks, IBS Symptom Severity Scale, IBS Quality of Life, Adequate Relief scale, and individual IBS symptoms (abdominal pain, bloating, stool frequency) are chosen as secondary endpoints.
Discussion
This trial may provide high-quality evidence for the efficacy and safety of acupuncture in the treatment of IBS-D. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals.
Trial registration
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2100044762. Registered on 26 March 2021.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference32 articles.
1. Flacco ME, Manzoli L, De Giorgio R, Gasbarrini A, Cicchetti A, Bravi F, et al. Costs of irritable bowel syndrome in European countries with universal healthcare coverage: a meta-analysis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23:2986–3000.
2. Fang Z, Wei X, Chun-Yan L, Shu-Chuen L. Economic burden of irritable bowel syndrome in China. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:10450–60.
3. Peery Anne F, Crockett Seth D, Murphy Caitlin C, Lund Jennifer L, Dellon Evan S, Lucas WJ, et al. Burden and cost of gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the United States: update 2018. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:254–272.e11.
4. Priya O, Heather P, Brigida B, Black Christopher J, Savarino Edoardo V, Ford Alexander C. Global prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome according to Rome III or IV criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5:908–17.
5. Tillisch K. Complementary and alternative medicine for functional gastrointestinal disorders. Gut. 2006;55:593–6.