Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To establish if Black adults and adult ethnic minorities, defined as any group except White British, were represented in UK-based COVID-19 vaccination randomised controlled trials (RCTs) when compared to corresponding UK population proportions, based on 2011 census data.
Design
Systematic review of COVID-19 Randomised Controlled Vaccine Trials
Setting
United Kingdom
Participants
Randomised Controlled Trials of COVID-19 vaccines conducted in the UK were systematically reviewed following PRISMA guidelines. MeSH terms included “Covid-19 vaccine”, “Ad26COVS1”, and “BNT162 Vaccine” with keywords such as [covishield OR coronavac OR Vaxzevria OR NVX-CoV2373] also used. Studies that provided (A) participant demographics and (B) full eligibility criteria were included. The following key data was extracted for analysis: number of participants analysed, number of Black adults and number of adult minority ethnicity participants.
Primary and Secondary Outcome Measures
The primary outcome is the mean percentage of Black adults randomised to COVID-19 vaccine trials deemed eligible within this review. The secondary outcome is the mean percentage of adult ethnic minorities randomised.
Results
The final review included 7 papers and a total of 87 sets of data collated from trial sites across the UK. The standard mean percentage of Black adults included in the trials (0.59%, 95% CI: 0.13% - 1.05%) was significantly lower compared to the recorded Black adult population (2.67%) indicating that they were under-served in UK based COVID-19 vaccine RCTs (p < 0.001). Adult ethnic minority presence (8.94%, 95% CI: 2.07% - 15.80%) was also lower than census data (16.30%), indicating they were also under-served (p = 0.039).
Conclusion
The findings show that COVID-19 vaccine trials failed to adequately randomise proportionate numbers of Black adults and adult minority ethnicities. More inclusive practices must be developed and implemented in the recruitment of underserved groups to understand the true impact of COVID-19.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. World Health Organisation. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Apr 26]. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/
2. Public Health England. Disparities in the risk and outcomes of COVID-19 [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Apr 20]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-review-of-disparities-in-risks-and-outcomes
3. National Institute for Health and Care Research. NIHR research ethnicity data provides insight on participation in COVID-19 studies [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 May 4]. Available from: https://www.nihr.ac.uk/news/nihr-research-ethnicity-data-provides-insight-on-participation-in-covid-19-studies/26460
4. Race Disparity Unit UG. Writing about ethnicity [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Apr 27]. Available from: https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/style-guide/writing-about-ethnicity#help-us-stay-up-to-date
5. Chaturvedi N, McKeigue PM, Marmot MG. Resting and ambulatory blood pressure differences in Afro-Caribbeans and Europeans. Hypertension [Internet]. 1993 Jul [cited 2022 Apr 20];22(1):90–6. Available from: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/01.hyp.22.1.90
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献