Recruiting women with ductal carcinoma in situ to a randomised controlled trial: lessons from the LORIS study
Author:
Wheelwright SallyORCID, Matthews Lucy, Jenkins Valerie, May Shirley, Rea Daniel, Fairbrother Pat, Gaunt Claire, Young Jennie, Pirrie Sarah, Wallis Matthew G., Fallowfield Lesley, Bartlett John M. S., Billingham Lucinda, Bowden Sarah, Brace-McDonnell Samantha, Brookes Cassandra, Cain Henry, Dodwell David, Evans Andrew, Fairbrother Patricia, Ferguson Douglas, Francis Adele, Hanby Andrew, Hoar Fiona, Holt Simon, Kirwan Cliona, McIntosh Stuart, Pinder Sarah E., Reed Malcolm, Roberts Tracy, Rusby Jennifer, Sharma Nisha, Sibley Pauline, Thomas Jeremy, Wilcox Maggie,
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The LOw RISk DCIS (LORIS) study was set up to compare conventional surgical treatment with active monitoring in women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Recruitment to trials with a surveillance arm is known to be challenging, so strategies to maximise patient recruitment, aimed at both patients and recruiting centres, were implemented.
Methods
Women aged ≥ 46 years with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of non-high-grade DCIS were eligible for 1:1 randomisation to either surgery or active monitoring. Prior to randomisation, all eligible women were invited to complete: (1) the Clinical Trials Questionnaire (CTQ) examining reasons for or against participation, and (2) interviews exploring in depth opinions about the study information sheets and film. Women agreeing to randomisation completed validated questionnaires assessing health status, physical and mental health, and anxiety levels. Hospital site staff were invited to communication workshops and refresher site initiation visits to support recruitment. Their perspectives on LORIS recruitment were collected via surveys and interviews.
Results
Eighty percent (181/227) of eligible women agreed to be randomised. Over 40% of participants had high anxiety levels at baseline. On the CTQ, the most frequent most important reasons for accepting randomisation were altruism and belief that the trial offered the best treatment, whilst worries about randomisation and the influences of others were the most frequent most important reasons for declining. Most women found the study information provided clear and useful. Communication workshops for site staff improved knowledge and confidence but only about half said they themselves would join LORIS if eligible. The most common recruitment barriers identified by staff were low numbers of eligible patients and patient preference.
Conclusions
Recruitment to LORIS was challenging despite strategies aimed at both patients and site staff. Ensuring that recruiting staff support the study could improve recruitment in similar future trials.
Trial registration
ISRCTN27544579, prospectively registered on 22 May 2014
Funder
Health Technology Assessment Programme
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference26 articles.
1. Grimm LJ, Rahbar H, Abdelmalak M, Hall AH, Ryser MD. Ductal carcinoma in situ: state-of-the-art review. Radiology. 2022;302(2):246–55. 2. Virnig BA, Tuttle TM, Shamliyan T, Kane RL. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review of incidence, treatment, and outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(3):170–8. 3. NHS Breast Screening Programme, Association of Breast Surgery. An audit of screen detected breast cancers for the screening year April 2020 to March 2021. 2022. 4. Marmot MG, Altman DG, Cameron DA, Dewar JA, Thompson SG, Wilcox M. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Br J Cancer. 2013;108(11):2205–40. 5. Groen EJ, Elshof LE, Visser LL, Rutgers EJT, Winter-Warnars HAO, Lips EH, et al. Finding the balance between over- and under-treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Breast. 2017;31:274–83.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|