Downstream or upstream administration of P2Y12 receptor blockers in non-ST elevated acute coronary syndromes: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Author:
Tarantini Giuseppe, Mojoli MarcoORCID, Varbella Ferdinando, Caporale Roberto, Rigattieri Stefano, Andò Giuseppe, Cirillo Plinio, Pierini Simona, Santarelli Andrea, Sganzerla Paolo, De Cesare Nicoletta, Limbruno Ugo, Lupi Alessandro, Ricci Roberto, Cernetti Carlo, Favero Luca, Saia Francesco, Roncon Loris, Gasparetto Valeria, Ferlini Marco, Ronco Federico, Ferri Luca, Trabattoni Daniela, Russo Alessandra, Guiducci Vincenzo, Penzo Carlo, Tarantino Fabio, Mauro Ciro, Marchese Alfredo, Castiglioni Battistina, La Manna Alessio, Martinato Matteo, Gregori Dario, Angiolillo Dominick J., Musumeci Giuseppe
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The optimal timing to administer a P2Y12 inhibitor in patients presenting with a non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome remains a topic of debate. Pretreatment with ticagrelor before coronary anatomy is known as a widely adopted strategy. However, there is poor evidence on how this compares with administration of a P2Y12 inhibitor after defining coronary anatomy (i.e., downstream administration). Moreover, there are limited head-to-head comparisons of the two P2Y12 inhibitors—ticagrelor and prasugrel—currently recommended by the guidelines.
Study design
DUBIUS is a phase 4, multicenter, parallel-group, double randomized study conducted in NSTE-ACS patients designed to compare a pretreatment strategy (including only ticagrelor) versus a downstream strategy (including prasugrel or ticagrelor) and to compare downstream prasugrel with downstream ticagrelor. A total of 2520 patients will be randomly assigned to pretreatment with ticagrelor or to no pretreatment. The PCI group of the downstream arm will be further randomized to receive prasugrel or ticagrelor. The two primary hypotheses are that the downstream strategy is superior to the upstream strategy and that downstream ticagrelor is non-inferior to downstream prasugrel, both measured by the incidence of a composite efficacy and safety endpoint of death from vascular causes, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3, 4, and 5 bleedings.
Conclusions
The DUBIUS study will provide important evidence related to the benefits and risks of pretreatment with ticagrelor compared with a strategy of no pretreatment. Moreover, the clinical impact of using downstream ticagrelor compared with downstream prasugrel will be assessed.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02618837. Registered on 1 December 2015.
Funder
Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova Società Italiana di Cardiologia Interventistica
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference25 articles.
1. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, TRITON-TIMI 38 Investigators, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute cor- onary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2001–15. 2. Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(11):1045–57. 3. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(2):87–165. 4. Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2016;37(3):267–315. 5. Capodanno D, Angiolillo DJ. Reviewing the controversy surrounding pre-treatment with P2Y12 inhibitors in acute coronary syndrome patients. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2016;14(7):811–20.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|