Abstract
Abstract
Background
Prolonging working careers is a key policy goal in ageing populations in Europe, but reaching this goal is complex. Occupational health services are in the best position to contribute towards prolonging working careers through preventing illnesses that cause work disability and early retirement. However, impacting on the trajectory between illness and work disability requires continuity of care and follow up, enabled through identifying patients at risk. We aimed to determine whether a combined educational and electronic reminder system in occupational health care could improve the recording and follow up of primary care visits made by patients at risk of work disability, and whether the system could impact on sickness absence rates.
Methods
This study is a pragmatic, cluster-randomized controlled trial using medical record data. Twenty-two Pihlajalinna Työterveys units were randomized into an intervention group receiving education and electronic reminders or a group receiving usual care through minimization methods. Patient consultation data were extracted from routine Pihlajalinna Työterveys patient registers from 2015 to 2017. In addition, process indicators were collected from the electronic system. Data were cleaned and analysed on an intention-to-treat basis using analysis of covariance.
Results
There was no significant difference between intervention and control units in terms of sickness absences of different duration. Process indicators suggested that there was a change in physicians’ practice of recording patients’ risk of work disability and work-relatedness of visits following the educational intervention.
Conclusion
Education with an electronic reminder can change physicians’ practice, but long-term follow up is needed to determine whether this impacts on patients’ sickness absences.
Trial registration
ISRCTN Registry: ISRCTN45728263. Registered on 12 April 2016.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference30 articles.
1. Waddell G, Burton AKK. Is work good for your health and wellbeing? London: TSO; 2006. Epub ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2012-219.
2. Työelämäryhmä. Ehdotuksia työurien pidentämiseksi - Työelämäryhmän loppuraportti [Finnish: Suggestions to lengthen working careers - Finaö report of the working life commission]. Helsinki: Finnish Centre for Pensions; 2010. https://www.etk.fi/elakejarjestelmat/elakejarjestelma-muutoksessa/lisaa-tyourista/.
3. Nilsson K. Why work beyond 65? Discourse on the decision to continue working or retire early. Nord J Work Life. 2012;2:7–28.
4. Rantala J, Hietaniemi M, Nyman H, et al. Työkyvyttömyyseläkkeensaajien eläketurva ja toimeentulo 2000-luvulla [Finnish; Pension and livelihoods among disability pension recipients in the 21st century]. Helsinki: Eläketurvakeskus /Finnish Centre for Pensions; 2017.
5. Finnish Centre for Pensions. Earnings-related pension recipients in Finland 2017. Helsinki: Eläketurvakeskus /Finnish Centre for Pensions; 2018.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献