Digital endpoints in clinical trials: emerging themes from a multi-stakeholder Knowledge Exchange event

Author:

Tackney Mia S.ORCID,Steele Amber,Newman Joseph,Fritzsche Marie-Christine,Lucivero Federica,Khadjesari Zarnie,Lynch Jennifer,Abbott Rosemary A.,Barber Vicki S.,Carpenter James R.,Copsey Bethan,Davies Elin H.,Dixon William G.,Fox Lisa,González Javier,Griffiths Jessica,Hinchliffe Chloe H. L.,Kolanko Magdalena A.,McGagh Dylan,Rodriguez Aryelly,Roussos George,So Karen B. E.,Stanton Louise,Toshner Mark,Varian Frances,Williamson Paula R.,Yimer Belay B.,Villar Sofía S.

Abstract

Abstract Background Digital technologies, such as wearable devices and smartphone applications (apps), can enable the decentralisation of clinical trials by measuring endpoints in people’s chosen locations rather than in traditional clinical settings. Digital endpoints can allow high-frequency and sensitive measurements of health outcomes compared to visit-based endpoints which provide an episodic snapshot of a person’s health. However, there are underexplored challenges in this emerging space that require interdisciplinary and cross-sector collaboration. A multi-stakeholder Knowledge Exchange event was organised to facilitate conversations across silos within this research ecosystem. Methods A survey was sent to an initial list of stakeholders to identify potential discussion topics. Additional stakeholders were identified through iterative discussions on perspectives that needed representation. Co-design meetings with attendees were held to discuss the scope, format and ethos of the event. The event itself featured a cross-disciplinary selection of talks, a panel discussion, small-group discussions facilitated via a rolling seating plan and audience participation via Slido. A transcript was generated from the day, which, together with the output from Slido, provided a record of the day’s discussions. Finally, meetings were held following the event to identify the key challenges for digital endpoints which emerged and reflections and recommendations for dissemination. Results Several challenges for digital endpoints were identified in the following areas: patient adherence and acceptability; algorithms and software for devices; design, analysis and conduct of clinical trials with digital endpoints; the environmental impact of digital endpoints; and the need for ongoing ethical support. Learnings taken for next generation events include the need to include additional stakeholder perspectives, such as those of funders and regulators, and the need for additional resources and facilitation to allow patient and public contributors to engage meaningfully during the event. Conclusions The event emphasised the importance of consortium building and highlighted the critical role that collaborative, multi-disciplinary, and cross-sector efforts play in driving innovation in research design and strategic partnership building moving forward. This necessitates enhanced recognition by funders to support multi-stakeholder projects with patient involvement, standardised terminology, and the utilisation of open-source software.

Funder

All Council Harmonised IAA Rapid Response Award

NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre

Cambridge Centre for Data-Driven Discovery

Medical Research Council

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme

HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme

Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking

IDEA-FAST

Alzheimer's Society

MRC Experimental Medicine Award

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference61 articles.

1. National Health Service. The NHS Long Term Plan. 2019. Available from: https://www.longtermplan.nhs.uk/publication/nhs-long-term-plan/ [accessed Apr 12, 2024].

2. Health and Social Care Committee. Digital transformation in the NHS, Eighth Report of Session 2022–23. 2023 Jun. Available from: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5803/cmselect/cmhealth/223/report.html [accessed Apr 12, 2024].

3. Fazey I, Bunse L, Msika J, Pinke M, Preedy K, Evely AC, Lambert E, Hastings E, Morris S, Reed MS. Evaluating knowledge exchange in interdisciplinary and multi-stakeholder research. Glob Environ Chang. 2014;25:204–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.012.

4. Tako A, Kotiadis K. A facilitation workshop for the implementation stage: A case study in health care. Loughborough University. Conference Contribution. ; 2016. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/2134/21820 [accessed Apr 13, 2024].

5. Prihodova L, Guerin S, Kernohan WG. Knowledge transfer and exchange frameworks in health and their applicability to palliative care: scoping review protocol. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71(7):1717–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12642.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3