Digital endpoints in clinical trials: emerging themes from a multi-stakeholder Knowledge Exchange event
Author:
Tackney Mia S.ORCID, Steele Amber, Newman Joseph, Fritzsche Marie-Christine, Lucivero Federica, Khadjesari Zarnie, Lynch Jennifer, Abbott Rosemary A., Barber Vicki S., Carpenter James R., Copsey Bethan, Davies Elin H., Dixon William G., Fox Lisa, González Javier, Griffiths Jessica, Hinchliffe Chloe H. L., Kolanko Magdalena A., McGagh Dylan, Rodriguez Aryelly, Roussos George, So Karen B. E., Stanton Louise, Toshner Mark, Varian Frances, Williamson Paula R., Yimer Belay B., Villar Sofía S.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Digital technologies, such as wearable devices and smartphone applications (apps), can enable the decentralisation of clinical trials by measuring endpoints in people’s chosen locations rather than in traditional clinical settings. Digital endpoints can allow high-frequency and sensitive measurements of health outcomes compared to visit-based endpoints which provide an episodic snapshot of a person’s health. However, there are underexplored challenges in this emerging space that require interdisciplinary and cross-sector collaboration. A multi-stakeholder Knowledge Exchange event was organised to facilitate conversations across silos within this research ecosystem.
Methods
A survey was sent to an initial list of stakeholders to identify potential discussion topics. Additional stakeholders were identified through iterative discussions on perspectives that needed representation. Co-design meetings with attendees were held to discuss the scope, format and ethos of the event. The event itself featured a cross-disciplinary selection of talks, a panel discussion, small-group discussions facilitated via a rolling seating plan and audience participation via Slido. A transcript was generated from the day, which, together with the output from Slido, provided a record of the day’s discussions. Finally, meetings were held following the event to identify the key challenges for digital endpoints which emerged and reflections and recommendations for dissemination.
Results
Several challenges for digital endpoints were identified in the following areas: patient adherence and acceptability; algorithms and software for devices; design, analysis and conduct of clinical trials with digital endpoints; the environmental impact of digital endpoints; and the need for ongoing ethical support. Learnings taken for next generation events include the need to include additional stakeholder perspectives, such as those of funders and regulators, and the need for additional resources and facilitation to allow patient and public contributors to engage meaningfully during the event.
Conclusions
The event emphasised the importance of consortium building and highlighted the critical role that collaborative, multi-disciplinary, and cross-sector efforts play in driving innovation in research design and strategic partnership building moving forward. This necessitates enhanced recognition by funders to support multi-stakeholder projects with patient involvement, standardised terminology, and the utilisation of open-source software.
Funder
All Council Harmonised IAA Rapid Response Award NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre Cambridge Centre for Data-Driven Discovery Medical Research Council Horizon 2020 Framework Programme HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking IDEA-FAST Alzheimer's Society MRC Experimental Medicine Award
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference61 articles.
1. National Health Service. The NHS Long Term Plan. 2019. Available from: https://www.longtermplan.nhs.uk/publication/nhs-long-term-plan/ [accessed Apr 12, 2024]. 2. Health and Social Care Committee. Digital transformation in the NHS, Eighth Report of Session 2022–23. 2023 Jun. Available from: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5803/cmselect/cmhealth/223/report.html [accessed Apr 12, 2024]. 3. Fazey I, Bunse L, Msika J, Pinke M, Preedy K, Evely AC, Lambert E, Hastings E, Morris S, Reed MS. Evaluating knowledge exchange in interdisciplinary and multi-stakeholder research. Glob Environ Chang. 2014;25:204–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.012. 4. Tako A, Kotiadis K. A facilitation workshop for the implementation stage: A case study in health care. Loughborough University. Conference Contribution. ; 2016. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/2134/21820 [accessed Apr 13, 2024]. 5. Prihodova L, Guerin S, Kernohan WG. Knowledge transfer and exchange frameworks in health and their applicability to palliative care: scoping review protocol. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71(7):1717–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12642.
|
|