Abstract
AbstractThe technology of vibratory mixing has been applied to improve the compressive strength of cement-stabilized macadam (CSM). The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of vibration acceleration and cement dosage on the unconfined compressive strength and density of CSM. The mixtures with four cement dosages (2%, 3%, 4%, and 5%) were prepared by conventional mixing (0 g) and vibratory mixing (1 g, 2 g, and 3.5 g). The unconfined compressive strength was tested under different mixing methods. And the microstructure of CSM was analyzed by scanning electron microscope. The results indicate that samples using vibratory mixing have higher strengths, lower coefficient of variation, and denser microstructures, compared with the conventional compulsory mixing. Compared with 15% in conventional mixing, the strength variable coefficient of CSM is less than 10% in the vibratory mixing method. As the cement dosage and the vibration acceleration increase, the unconfined compressive strength increases. However, cement dosage has a more significant influence on improving the unconfined compressive strength than the mixing method. With the increase of every 1% in cement dosage, the 7-day strength of conventional mixing and in vibratory mixing average increased by 59% and 38%, respectively. However, the maximum improvement rate of the UCS value is 20–56.7% when vibration acceleration increased from 0 to 1 g. Especially when cement dosage is high, the effect of vibratory mixing on improving strength is limited. Besides, vibratory mixing reduces the original cement dosage by over 1.6% with the qualified unconfined compressive strength at vibration acceleration of 2 g, which is recommended in construction practice.
Funder
natural science foundation of shaanxi province
postdoctoral research foundation of china
china scholarship council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Ocean Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference61 articles.
1. Abd El-Motaal, A. M., Abdel-Reheem, A., & Mahdy, M. (2020). Effect of low mixing speed on the properties of prolonged mixed concrete. Civil Engineering Journal, 6(8), 1581–1592.
2. Beitzel, H., Charonnat, Y., & Beitzel, M. (2003). Assessment and classification of performance mixers. Materials and Structures, 36(4), 250–264.
3. Bi, J., Zheng, N., Zhang, F., (2017). Study on the application of vibration mixing for cement stabilized crushed stone. Southern African Transport Conference.
4. Chang, P. K., & Peng, Y. N. (2001). Influence of mixing techniques on properties of high performance concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 31(1), 87–95.
5. Chopin, D., de Larrard, F., & Cazacliu, B. (2004). Why do HPC and SCC require a longer mixing time? Cement and Concrete Research, 34(12), 2237–2243.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献