Towards a typology of social protection for migrants and refugees in Latin America during the COVID-19 pandemic
-
Published:2021-11-16
Issue:1
Volume:9
Page:
-
ISSN:2214-594X
-
Container-title:Comparative Migration Studies
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:CMS
Author:
Vera Espinoza MarciaORCID, Prieto Rosas Victoria, Zapata Gisela P., Gandini Luciana, Fernández de la Reguera Alethia, Herrera Gioconda, López Villamil Stephanie, Zamora Gómez Cristina María, Blouin Cécile, Montiel Camila, Cabezas Gálvez Gabriela, Palla Irene
Abstract
AbstractThe COVID-19 health crisis has put to the test Latin America’s already precarious social protection systems. This paper comparatively examines what type of social protection has been provided, by whom, and to what extent migrant and refugee populations have been included in these programmes in seven countries of the region during the COVID-19 pandemic, between March and December 2020. We develop a typology of models of social protection highlighting the assemblages of actors, different modes of protection and the emerging migrants’ subjectification in Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru, and Uruguay in relation to Non-Contributory Social Transfer (NCST) programmes and other actions undertaken by state and non-state actors. The analysis is based on 85 semi-structured interviews with representatives of national and local governments, International Organisations, Civil Society Organisations, and migrant-led organisations across 16 cities, and a systematic review of regulatory frameworks in the country-case studies. The proposed typology shows broad heterogeneity and complexity regarding different degrees of inclusion of migrant and refugee populations, particularly in pre-existing and new NCST programmes. These actions are furthering notions of migrant protection that are contingent and crisis-driven, imposing temporal limitations that often selectively exclude migrants based on legal status. It also brings to the fore the path-dependent nature of policies and practices of exclusion/inclusion in the region, which impact on migrants’ effective access to social and economic rights, while shaping the broader dynamics of migration governance in the region.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Sociology and Political Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Demography,Law,Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Sociology and Political Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Demography
Reference55 articles.
1. Acosta, D. (2018). The national versus the foreigner in South America. 200 Years of migration and citizenship law. Cambridge University Press. 2. Acosta, D., Blouin, C., & Freier, L. F. (2019). La emigración venezolana: Respuestas latinoamericanas. Fundación Carolina. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/7097487.pdf. Accessed 22 June 2020. 3. Acuña, J. (2021). Informe No 3 OCEC: Subsidios en Pandemia. Julio 2021. Santiago: OCEC UDP. https://ocec.udp.cl/proyecto/552/. 4. Asa, P., & Ceriani, P. (2010). Migrantes, derechos sociales y políticas públicas en América Latina y El Caribe: La universalidad en juego. In P. Arcidiácono, N. Espejo Yaksic, & C. Rodríguez Garavito (Eds.), Derechos sociales: Justicia, política y economía en América Latina (pp. 331–384). Siglo de Hombre Editores y la eHR. 5. Avritzer, L. (2007). Sociedade civil, instituições participativas e representação: Da autorização à legitimidade da ação. Dados, 50(3), 443–464.
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|