Abstract
AbstractSocial remittances- the transfer of ideas, practices, and codes of behaviors- are a well-documented subject in migrant transnationalism literature and transnational family studies. However, the COVID-19 (coronavirus) outbreak has generated unprecedented regulations around the world which require widening the conceptual basis of social remittances in a state of emergency. As the pandemic progresses, most countries require civilians to follow a number of norms deemed as the “new normality,” while other countries continue to operate under their “old normality,” with minor or no restrictions. As national pandemic policy responses vary across countries, transnational families live under different regimes of “normality.” In these settings, the study of transnational families offers a valuable opportunity to examine a special type of social remittances practiced during global crises, and analyze whether the exchange of rules, practices, and ideas across national borders has any impact on re-shaping and renegotiating pandemic-coping “new normality” practices for both migrants and their families. The paper is based on 13 in-depth interviews conducted with representatives from Armenian transnational families with migrant members in Russia, the Czech Republic, or Belarus. These countries provide a backdrop for an examination of social remittances among transnational families that we term “pandemic transnationalism.” The study shows that the circulation of safety rules and “good practices” actively shapes the everyday behavior of migrants and their families, their level of perceived danger towards the coronavirus, and their practical knowledge of safety measures. The latter are often harnessed in informal collective settings despite being in conflict with the obligations and regulations of their home society.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Sociology and Political Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Demography,Law,Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Sociology and Political Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Demography
Reference81 articles.
1. Abel, J. G., & Gietel-Basten, S. (2020). International remittance flows and the economic and social consequences of COVID-19. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52(8), 1480–1482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20931111.
2. Ackers, L., & Stalford, H. (2004). A community for children?: Children, citizenship, and internal migration in the EU. Ashgate Pub Ltd.
3. Adamson, F. B. (2020). Non-state authoritarianism and diaspora politics. Global Networks, 20(1), 150–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12246.
4. Ambrosini, M. (2018). Migrations and transnationalism: Distinctions, types and empirical findings. In Globalization, supranational dynamics and local experiences (pp. 65–85). Palgrave Macmillan.
5. Ang, A. P., & Opiniano, J. (2020). Possible economic impacts of falling oil prices, the pandemic, and the looming global recession onto overseas Filipinos and their remittances (no. 202005). Department of Economics, Ateneo de Manila University.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献