Abstract
AbstractThe study of international migration and responses to it has experienced rapid growth in the last three decades: an institutionalisation of migration studies. This paper identifies and specifies infrastructural and semantic elements of institutionalisation by establishing a global Directory of Migration Research Institutions identifying 282 institutes focused on migration research that were operative between 1945 and 2020. We observe a clear geographical concentration in the Americas and Europe and find that most institutes are in countries with higher economic development (GDP) and net immigration (not emigration). Using this evidence, we suggest that the institutionalisation of migration studies is driven by concerns and ideas produced in high-income ‘destination’ countries. We thus show that uneven knowledge production in migration studies is not only caused by exclusive categories, language, or journal policies, but also by a structural problem at an earlier stage: because of fewer resources invested in the creation of institutionalised academic knowledge structures, lower income countries have fewer possibilities to shape the semantic features of the field of migration studies, by which we mean the identification of subjects of interest, concepts, narratives, and priorities.
Funder
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Sociology and Political Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Demography,Law,Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Sociology and Political Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Demography
Reference33 articles.
1. Achiume, T. (2019). Migration as decolonization. Stanford Law Rev, 71, 1509–1574.
2. African Academy for Migration Research. (2021). Rethinking Knowledge Politics in Migration Research, Teaching & Practice. Retrieved 3 December 2021 from; http://www.migration.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Rethinking-Knowledge-Politics-in-Migration-Research-Teaching-Practice-_WorkshopCall_September2021.pdf
3. Anthias, F. (2012). Transnational mobilities, migration research and intersectionality: Towards a translocational frame. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 2, 102–110. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10202-011-0032-y
4. Boswell, C. (2009). The political uses of expert knowledge: immigration policy and social research. Cambridge University Press.
5. Boswell, C., Geddes, A., & Scholten, P. (2011). The role of narratives in migration policy-making: A research framework. Br J Polit Int Relat, 13, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2010.00435.x
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献