Abstract
AbstractEuropean migration studies have been criticised for having certain epistemological and theoretical underpinnings that reproduce hegemonic structures, especially the ‘national order of things’ and colonial legacies. In this article, we propose the concept of ‘entangled mobilities’ to address some of these challenges. Entangled mobilities as a theoretical lens enables us to study specific global and transnational processes, the ways in which they are historically and locally situated, and how they materialise in individual mobilities of differently positioned actors within an unequal political global economy. This lens helps us simultaneously overcome nationality- and ethnicity-centred epistemologies, confront colonial aphasia, and be sensitive to the multiple inequalities and mobility regimes within which human mobilities evolve. Furthermore, the prism of entangled mobilities provides an ideal methodological departure point from which to systematically examine how human mobilities are intertwined and interdependent and to reveal how they are embedded in and shaped by asymmetric, historically evolved power structures. We propose three pragmatic entry points for mobilising the concept: in specific places, in terms of the intersections and interdependencies of different mobile people, and in the context of the biographical trajectories of individuals. Finally, we invite scholars from other fields, such as policy research, to innovatively adapt this approach to gain alternative knowledge and address inequalities.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Sociology and Political Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Demography,General Medicine
Reference96 articles.
1. Adey, P. (2003). Secured and sorted mobilities: Examples from the airport. Surveillance & Society, 1(4), 501–519.
2. Amelina, A.
(2021). After the reflexive turn in migration studies: Towards the doing migration approach. Population, Space and Place, 27(1),
e2368. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2368.
3. Anderson, B. (2019). New directions in migration studies: Towards methodological de-nationalism. Comparative Migration Studies, 7(36), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-019-0140-8
4. Anthias, F. (2012). Transnational mobilities, migration research and intersectionality’. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 2(2), 102–110.
5. Appadurai, A. (1999). Global ethnoscapes: Notes and queries for a transnational anthropology. In S. Vertovec & R. Cohen (Eds.), Migration, diasporas and transnationalism (pp. 463–483). Edward Elgar.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献