Socio-psychological integration from the perspective of receiving communities: a cross-country comparison between Sweden, Germany, Croatia and Jordan

Author:

Kiralj Lacković JanaORCID,Ajduković Dean,Abdel-Fatah Dana,Hertner Laura,Alkhatib Walid

Abstract

AbstractThe socio-psychological dimension of integration is based on relations between the refugees and receiving community members revealed through intergroup thoughts, perceptions, emotions and behaviours. This study aimed to investigate and interpret the differences in the indicators of socio-psychological integration among the receiving communities of Sweden, Germany, Croatia and Jordan—countries with diverse socio-economic, socio-political and cultural contexts, histories of inward migration, as well as differently preferred destinations in the migration of refugees from Syria in the 2010s. The contextual differences are reflected in the attitudes of the members of receiving communities towards refugees from Syria, perceptions of realistic and symbolic threats posed by refugees, frequency and valence of intergroup contact, support for the rights of refugees and readiness to assist them, social proximity, perception of refugees’ exposure to discrimination, and the assessment of how much the refugees are a part of the respective local communities.

Funder

Horizon 2020

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Sociology and Political Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Demography,Law,Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Sociology and Political Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Demography

Reference72 articles.

1. Abeywickrama, R. S., Laham, S. M., & Crone, D. L. (2018). Immigration and receiving communities: The utility of threats and emotions in predicting action tendencies toward refugees, asylum-seekers and economic migrants. Journal of Social Issues, 74(4), 756–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12297

2. Ajduković, D., Čorkalo Biruški, D., Gregurović, M., Matić Bojić, J., & Župarić Iljić, D. (2019). Izazovi integracije izbjeglica u hrvatsko društvo: stavovi građana i pripremljenost lokalnih zajednica. [Challenges of integration of refugees into Croatian society: Attitudes of citizens and the readiness of local communities]. Zagreb: Ured za ljudska prava i prava nacionalnih manjina. Available at: https://ljudskaprava.gov.hr/UserDocsImages//dokumenti//Challenges%20of%20Integrating%20Refugees%20into%20Croatian%20Society.pdf

3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2000). Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779943000116

4. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Adison-Wesley.

5. Anderson, J. R. (2016). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward asylum seekers: Demographic and ideological correlates. Australian Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12229

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3