Safety and effectiveness of prilocaine for spinal anesthesia in day surgery setting: a retrospective study on a sample of 3291 patients

Author:

Ambrosoli Andrea LuigiORCID,Di Carlo Stefano,Crespi Andrea,Severgnini Paolo,Fedele Luisa Luciana,Cofini Vincenza,Necozione Stefano,Musella Giuseppe

Abstract

AbstractSpinal anesthesia is considered safe and reliable for most surgical procedures involving the lower part of the body, but its use in the ambulatory setting requires drugs with rapid onset and regression of the motor and sensory block-like prilocaine.The purpose of this study is to retrospectively analyze data from 3291 procedures recorded in our institutional database, to better define the safety profile of spinal prilocaine and the incidence of complications and side effects.All clinical data, prospectively collected from 2011 to 2019 in an Italian tertiary hospital, of patients treated with spinal anesthesia performed with 40 mg of hyperbaric 2% prilocaine, according to our internal protocol of day surgery, were analyzed.Surgical procedures included saphenectomy (28.5%, n = 937), knee arthroscopy (26.8%, n = 882), proctologic surgery (15.16%, n = 499), and inguinal canal surgery (14.9%, n = 491).Anesthesia-related complication was represented by urinary retention (1.09%, n = 36), lipotimia (0.75%, n = 25), and postoperative nausea (0.33%, n = 11); arrhythmic events were uncommon (0.18%, n = 6). One case of persistent hypotension and 2 cases of persistent hypertension were reported.Persistent motor or sensory block (lasting more than 5 h) was experienced by 7 patients. One patient (0.03%), who underwent knee arthroscopy, experienced pelvic pain lasting for 6 h, compatible with a transient neurological symptom.Proctologic surgery was a factor associated with unplanned admission due to anesthesia-related complications (OR = 4.9; 95% CI: 2–14%).The number of complications related to the method was low as well as the need for hospitalization. This drug is valid and safe for the most performed day surgery procedures; however, further trials are needed to investigate the incidence of complications in the days following the procedure.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference24 articles.

1. Hall MJ, Schwartzman A, Zhang J, Liu X (2017) Ambulatory surgery data from hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers: United States, 2010. Natl Health Stat Report 102:1–15

2. Förster JG (2014) Short-acting spinal anesthesia in the ambulatory setting. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 27(6):597–604

3. Robertson DH (1978) Spinal prilocaine. Anaesthesia 33(7):647–648

4. Boublik J, Gupta R, Bhar S, Atchabahian A (2016) Prilocaine spinal anesthesia for ambulatory surgery: a review of the available studies. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 35(6):417–421

5. König W, Ruzicic D (1997) Absence of transient radicular irritation after 5000 spinal anaesthetics with prilocaine (correspondence). Anaesthesia 52:182

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Prilocaine vs bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for urologic endoscopy: clinical trials & historical overview;Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION;2024-08-26

2. Spinal anesthesia in ambulatory patients;Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology;2024-07-04

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3