Abstract
AbstractEmergency settings in obese people require tailored multidisciplinary protocols and pathways to manage these complex patients. For this reason, we would like to foresee a proficient cooperation with the UK Society for Obesity and Bariatric Anaesthesia (SOBA) and other societies: obesity is a worldwide problem, and an international and multidisciplinary cooperation is desirable, if not needed. As demonstrated for bariatric surgery, a standardizing anesthesiologic and critical approach and an experienced multidisciplinary staff, trained and equipped to manage obese patients, are related to better outcomes. Similarly, as recently pointed out for airway management safety, we believe that the presence of anobese leadshould be a desirable goal to reach in the next future, especially when thinking of emergency situations and the need for resuscitation of obese patients. A worldwide problem calls for worldwide cooperation.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference10 articles.
1. McKechnie A, Pengelly L, Cousins J (2021) on behalf of SU. SOBA UK response to “emergencies in obese patients: a narrative review”. Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and. Crit Care 1(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-021-00027-2
2. Di Giacinto I, Guarnera M, Esposito C et al (2021) Emergencies in obese patients: a narrative review. Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and. Crit Care 1(1):13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-021-00019-2
3. Petrini F, Di Giacinto I, Cataldo R et al (2016) Perioperative and periprocedural airway management and respiratory safety for the obese patient: 2016 Siaarti Consensus. Minerva Anestesiol 82(12):1314–1335
4. Marinari G, Folletto M, C N et al (2022) Enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery: an Italian consensus statement. Surg Endosc Accepted
5. Geubbels N, Evren I, Acherman YIZ, Bruin SC, Laar AWJM, Hoen MB, Brauw LM (2019) Randomized clinical trial of an enhanced recovery after surgery programme versus conventional care in laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass surgery. BJS Open 3(3):274–281. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50143