Abstract
AbstractFor patients on antithrombotic medication, the outcome of a planned surgery depends on the adjustment of their daily treatment. This study aimed to assess the impact of non-compliance to published recommendations about antithrombotic agents, specifically those provided by the Groupement d'Intérêt pour l'hémostase Peri-opératoire (GIHP), on patient morbidity and mortality.A prospective cohort observational monocentric study was conducted over a 7-month period in 2019 in an academic hospital. The study included patients on antithrombotic agents scheduled for elective surgery, excluding cardiac surgery. The primary endpoints were morbidity and mortality at 1 month according to GIHP guidelines compliance. Blood loss during surgery and length of hospital stay were secondary endpoints.Among the 589 patients included in the study, 87 complications were recorded, resulting in a morbidity rate of 14.8%. Thirty-six patients experienced hemorrhagic events, leading to 8 deaths, while 33 patients suffered from ischemic events, resulting in 3 deaths. Additionally, 18 patients died from causes unrelated to hemorrhage or ischemia. Compliance with GIHP guidelines was observed in 62% of patients. Statistical analysis did not reveal a significant association between adherence to guidelines and morbidity (p value = 0.923), nor between adherence and 1-month survival (p value = 0.698). Similarly, no statistically significant relationships were found between compliance and intraoperative bleeding volume (p value = 0.087), postoperative bleeding (p value = 0.460), or length of hospital stay (p value = 0.339).This study did not identify any substantial associations between non-strict adherence to GIHP recommendations and patient outcomes, including morbidity, mortality, and bleeding. However, it is important to interpret these findings with caution, considering the study’s limitations and the need for further research in this area.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. Parks AL, Fang MC (2017) Scoring systems for estimating the risk of anticoagulant-associated bleeding. Semin Thromb Hemost juill 43(5):514–524
2. Ko D, Hylek EM (2014) Anticoagulation in the older adult: optimizing benefit and reducing risk. Semin Thromb Hemost sept 40(6):688–694
3. Doherty JU, Gluckman TJ, Hucker WJ, Januzzi JL, Ortel TL, Saxonhouse SJ et al (2017) 2017 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Periprocedural Management of Anticoagulation in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document Task Force. J Am Coll Cardiol 69(7):871–98
4. Polania Gutierrez JJ, Rocuts KR. Perioperative anticoagulation management. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 [cité 30 déc 2020]. Disponible sur: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557590/
5. Dunn AS, Wisnivesky J, Ho W, Moore C, McGinn T, Sacks HS (2005) Perioperative management of patients on oral anticoagulants: a decision analysis. Med Decis Making 25(4):387–97