Abstract
Abstract
Background
Malaria has a negative impact on the activities of companies in endemic countries especially in Cameroon. In this regard, an increasingly growing number of companies have started to include management of malarious patients in their health policies. In the present study, we will evaluate the diagnostic performances of a fluorescence microscopy (FM), Cyscope® microscope, in the detection of malaria parasites.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted among employees of two companies of the town of Douala on 21 and 22 March 2017. Sociodemographic information of employees was collected using a questionnaire form. Blood samples of ~ 10 μL were collected by venipuncture for the diagnosis of malaria using FM and light microscopy (LM). Performances of FM with respect to sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), positive and negative likelihood rates (PLR and NLR), accuracy, reliability, and Kappa index were calculated using LM as gold standard.
Results
In total, 442 employees, aged 37.8 ± 9.7 years old on average, were included in the study. Prevalence of malaria using FM and LM was 39.2% and 17%, respectively (p < 0.01). Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax were the two species involved in malaria infection cases. In terms of developmental stages, 68%, 45.3%, and 1.3% of employees carried gametocytes, trophozoites, and schizonts, respectively. Findings on diagnostic performances of FM were as follows: Se = 84%, Sp = 69.95%, PPV = 63.58%, NPV = 95.5%, accuracy = 89.36%, and reliability = 53.95%. Sensitivity of Cyscope® microscope increased as a function of parasitemia with values ranging from 76.92% at parasitemia between 1 and 500 parasites/μL to 91.11% at parasitemia between 501 and 5000 parasites/μL. The geometric mean parasite density was1850 parasites per μL of blood (range 1600–40,000), and most of employees (60.8%) had moderate parasitemia. The performances of FM were similar between febrile and afebrile patients.
Conclusions
This study showed good performances of Cyscope® microscope and outlines that this diagnostic tool could be used in management of malaria at workplace.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference57 articles.
1. Bonneville J, Defrance C, Miklavec T. Guide pratique de lutte contre le paludisme en entreprise. France: Sanisphere; 2007. p. 116. https://docplayer.fr/13312311-Guide-pratique-de-lutte-contre-le-paludisme-en-entreprise-j-bonneville-c-d.
2. OMS Rapport sur le paludisme dans le monde 2019; Organisation Mondiale de la Santé: Genève, 2019; https://www.who.int/malaria/media/world-malaria-report-2019/fr/.
3. Leighton C, Foster R. Economic impacts of malaria in Kenya and Nigeria. Research paper 6, Health financing and sustainability project 1993. http://phrplus.org/Pubs/hfsmar6.pdf.
4. Lukwa AT, Mawoyo R, Zablon KN, Siya A, Alaba O. Effect of malaria on productivity in a workplace: the case of a banana plantation in Zimbabwe. Malar J. 2019;18:390. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-3021-6.
5. RBM Investissement des entreprises dans la lutte contre le paludisme; Organisation Mondiale de la Santé: Genève, 2011. https://path.azureedge.net/media/documents/MCP_rbm_pi_rpt_6_fr.pdf.