Developing ethical standards for dissemination and implementation research: a roadmap for consensus and guidance

Author:

Tetteh Emmanuel K.ORCID,Geng Elvin H.,Huffman Mark D.

Abstract

Abstract Background As a relatively new field, dissemination and implementation research has not been included as a separate study design category for ethical consideration compared with clinical and social/behavioral research, yet it should be based on unique study designs, targets of intervention, and corresponding risks. Main text Research teams conducting dissemination and implementation research have raised important questions related to the responsible conduct of research such as collecting informed consent, site monitoring, identifying and mitigating risks of unintended consequences, and adverse event ascertainment and reporting in dissemination and implementation research. In this commentary, we highlight the need for guidance and consensus standards on ethical issues in dissemination and implementation research and describe some ethical domains and relevant questions in dissemination and implementation research. Additionally, we propose a process for conceptual development and a research agenda to create consensus standards for the responsible conduct of research for dissemination and implementation research. Conclusion Thorough research is needed to understand the depth of ethical issues in dissemination and implementation research. A consensus-seeking process will be needed to develop new bioethical standards that carefully identify, measure, and mitigate unintended consequences in dissemination and implementation research.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

Reference23 articles.

1. National Research Council of the National Academies. Proposed revisions to the common rule for the protection of human subjects in the behavioral and social sciences. National Academies Press (US). 2014. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK217976/?report=classic. Accessed 24 Jan 2023.

2. Office for Human Research Protection. Institutional Review Board Guidebook. (1993). https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/register-irbs-and-obtain-fwas/index.html. Accessed 24 Jan 2023.

3. Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. https://www.meddra.org/. Accessed 24 Jan 2023.

4. Sekar K. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Funding: FY1996-FY2023. Congressional Research Services 2022; R43341. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R43341/44. Accessed 24 Jan 2023.

5. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Implementation Science Workshop Summary. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/events/2020/ethical-questions-implementation-science-workshop-summary. Accessed 24 Jan 2023.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3