Abstract
Abstract
Background
There is a fundamental gap in understanding the causal mechanisms by which strategies for implementing evidence-based practices address local barriers to effective, appropriate service delivery. Until this gap is addressed, scientific knowledge and practical guidance about which implementation strategies to use in which contexts will remain elusive. This research project aims to identify plausible strategy-mechanism linkages, develop causal models for mechanism evaluation, produce measures needed to evaluate such linkages, and make these models, methods, and measures available in a user-friendly website. The specific aims are as follows: (1) build a database of strategy-mechanism linkages and associated causal pathway diagrams, (2) develop psychometrically strong, pragmatic measures of mechanisms, and (3) develop and disseminate a website of implementation mechanisms knowledge for use by diverse stakeholders.
Methods
For the first aim, a combination of qualitative inquiry, expert panel methods, and causal pathway diagramming will be used to identify and confirm plausible strategy-mechanism linkages and articulate moderators, preconditions, and proximal and distal outcomes associated with those linkages. For the second aim, rapid-cycle measure development and testing methods will be employed to create reliable, valid, pragmatic measures of six mechanisms of common strategies for which no high-quality measures exist. For the third aim, we will develop a user-friendly website and searchable database that incorporates user-centered design, disseminating the final product using social marketing principles.
Discussion
Once strategy-mechanism linkages are identified using this multi-method approach, implementation scientists can use the searchable database to develop tailored implementation strategies and generate more robust evidence about which strategies work best in which contexts. Moreover, practitioners will be better able to select implementation strategies to address their specific implementation problems. New horizons in implementation strategy development, optimization, evaluation, and deployment are expected to be more attainable as a result of this research, which will lead to enhanced implementation of evidence-based interventions for cancer control, and ultimately improvements in patient outcomes.
Funder
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute
National Institute of Mental Health
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference57 articles.
1. Rabin BA, Glasgow RE, Kerner JF, Klump MP, Brownson RC. Dissemination and implementation research on community-based cancer prevention: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38(4):443–56.
2. Glasgow RE, Marcus AC, Bull SS, Wilson KM. Disseminating effective cancer screening interventions. Cancer. 2004;101(S5):1239–50.
3. Society for Implementation Research Collaboration. 4th Biennial Society for Implementation Research Collaboration 2018. Available from: https://societyforimplementationresearchcollaboration.org/4th-biennial-society-for-implementation-research-collaboration/. [Cited 2022 July 15].
4. Lewis CC, Larson M, Marriott BR, Jackson CB, Dorsey CN, Kerns SEU, et al. Optimizing psychological science’s impact on public health: Association for Pyschological Science; 2018. Available from: https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/optimizing-psychological-sciences-impact-on-public-health. [Cited 2022 July 15].
5. Ngo VK. Randomized control trial on implementation strategies for task-shifting depression care in Vietnam: Grantome; 2017. Available from: http://grantome.com/grant/NIH/R56-MH112630-01. [Cited 2022 July 15].
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献