Abstract
Abstract
Background
Half of child-welfare-involved children and adolescents meet the criteria for at least one mental health diagnosis. This project proposes to improve successful mental health service linkage in child welfare services (CWS) by adapting and testing the after-action review (AAR) team effectiveness intervention to augment the child and family team (CFT) services’ intervention. Despite being both required and a collaborative approach to service planning, CFT meetings are implemented with questionable fidelity and consistency, rarely including the voice of children and families as intended.
Methods
Using a parallel group trial design, with non-equivalent comparison groups, and qualitative and quantitative methodology, this study will tailor and assess the impact of the AAR on enhancing CFT outcomes. The authors will conduct a qualitative needs assessment targeting the ongoing implementation of the CFT services intervention in a large, publicly funded, CWS system. A qualitative inquiry consisting of interviews and focus groups with key stakeholders will result in the preparation of an action plan to address identified gaps between the current and desired CFT services intervention outcomes. The AAR implementation strategy will be adapted and tailored to address the CFT services’ intervention needs. To test the effectiveness of the AAR on improving outcomes associated with the CFT services intervention, we will utilize blocked randomization of four CWS caseworkers from two CWS system regions to either the intervention condition (CFT + AAR) or standard implementation (CFT as usual). The authors will collect data from the CWS caseworkers and additional CFT members via web-based surveys. Mechanisms of the AAR team effectiveness intervention for CFT implementation will be assessed.
Discussion
By inclusion of child and family voice, the AAR-enhanced CFT should lead to increased fidelity to the CFT intervention and greater levels of parental satisfaction with the service and shared decision-making, thus resulting in enhanced follow-through with service plans and linkage to mental health treatment services for children. The knowledge gained by this randomized clinical trial has the potential to benefit service delivery and integration for CWS leaders, caseworkers, formal and informal CFT member support persons, parents/caregivers, and children with open cases. Improving intervention effectiveness, both at the system and family levels, is crucial for practice efficiencies and improved child and family outcomes.
Trial registration
NCT05629013. Approval date: November 28, 2022 (version 1).
Trial sponsor
University of California, San Diego.
Responsible party
Danielle Fettes.
Funder
National Institute of Mental Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference67 articles.
1. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services AfCaF. Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. Washington, DC: Child Maltreatment 2020; 2022.
2. Swenson CC, Brown EJ, Lutzker JR. Issues of maltreatment and abuse. In: Freeman A, editor. Personality disorders in childhood and adolescence. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2007. p. 229–95.
3. Peterson C, Florence C, Klevens J. The economic burden of child maltreatment in the United States, 2015. Child Abuse Negl. 2018;86:178–83.
4. Burns BJ, Phillips SD, Wagner HR, Barth RP, Kolko DJ, Campbell Y, et al. Mental health needs and access to mental health services by youths involved with child welfare: a national survey. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004;43(8):960–70.
5. Hurlburt M, Leslie LK, Landsverk J, Barth RP, Burns BJ, Gibbons RD, et al. Contextual predictors of mental health service use among children open to child welfare. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004;61(12):1217–24.