Abstract
Abstract
Background
In the USA, 19% of new HIV infections occur among cisgender women (cis women); however, only 10% of eligible cis women have been prescribed pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for the prevention of HIV infection (an evidence-based intervention). A fundamental challenge for expanding HIV prevention to cis women is ensuring implementation strategies are tailored to the various healthcare settings in which cis women seek care and the heterogeneous providers nested within these settings. This project’s specific aims are to (1) explore clinician-level characteristics and organizational climate factors that are related to variability in adoption of PrEP service delivery as an evidence-based intervention for cis women; (2) identify latent audience segments of women’s health providers as the related to PrEP acceptability, adoption, and maintenance and analyze demographic correlates of these segments; and (3) identify audience segment-specific implementation strategies to facilitate the adoption of PrEP as an evidence-based intervention among at-risk cis women.
Methods
Using the i-PARIHS framework, this mixed-methods study examines three domains for guiding audience segmentation to facilitate PrEP implementation for cis women: innovation (degree of fit with existing practices, usability), recipient beliefs and knowledge and context factors (organizational culture, readiness for change), needs to determine appropriate facilitation methods. To achieve aim 1, qualitative interviews will be conducted with PrEP-eligible cis women, women’s health providers, and other key stakeholders. Aim 2 will consist of a quantitative survey among 340 women’s health providers. Latent class analysis will be used to facilitate audience segmentation.
To achieve aim 3, a panel of 5–8 providers for each audience segment will meet and engage in iterative discussions guided by Fernandez’s implementation mapping to identify (1) implementation outcomes and performance objectives, determinants, and change objectives and (2) determine and refine of implementation strategies for each audience segment.
Discussion
This exploratory mixed methods study will provide an empirical foundation to inform the development implementations strategies aimed at increasing PrEP delivery to cis women among heterogenous groups of providers.
Funder
National Institute of Mental Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference68 articles.
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV Surveillance Report, 2019.2021 July 3, 2023; 32.
2. Siegler AJ, Mouhanna F, Giler RM, Weiss K, Pembleton E, Guest J, et al. The prevalence of PrEP use and the PrEP-to-need ratio in the fourth quarter of 2017. United States Ann Epidemiol. 2018;28(12):841–9.
3. Piper KN, Anderson KM, Kokubun CW, Sheth AN, Sales J. Using qualitative comparative analysis to understand the conditions that produce successful PrEP implementation in family planning clinics. Implement Sci Commun. 2023;4(1):61.
4. Babiarz J, Nix CD, Bowden S, Roberts R. Insufficient PrEParation: an assessment of primary care prescribing habits and use of pre-exposure prophylaxis in patients at risk of HIV acquisition at a single medical centre. Sex Transm Infect. 2023;99(4):276–8.
5. Caplon A, Alexander KA, Kershaw T, Willie TC. Assessing provider-, clinic-, and structural-level barriers and recommendations to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake: a qualitative investigation among women experiencing intimate partner violence, intimate partner violence service providers, and healthcare providers. AIDS and Behav. 2021;25(10):3425–36.