Abstract
Abstract
Background
In vitro embryo production (IVP) and embryo transfer (ET) are two very common assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in human and cattle. However, in pig, the combination of either procedures, or even their use separately, is still considered suboptimal due to the low efficiency of IVP plus the difficulty of performing ET in the long and contorted uterus of the sow. In addition, the potential impact of these two ART on the health of the offspring is unknown. We investigated here if the use of a modified IVP system, with natural reproductive fluids (RF) as supplements to the culture media, combined with a minimally invasive surgery to perform ET, affects the output of the own IVP system as well as the reproductive performance of the mother and placental molecular traits.
Results
The blastocyst rates obtained by both in vitro systems, conventional (C-IVP) and modified (RF-IVP), were similar. Pregnancy and farrowing rates were also similar. However, when compared to in vivo control (artificial insemination, AI), litter sizes of both IVP groups were lower, while placental efficiency was higher in AI than in RF-IVP. Gene expression studies revealed aberrant expression levels for PEG3 and LUM in placental tissue for C-IVP group when compared to AI, but not for RF-IVP group.
Conclusions
The use of reproductive fluids as additives for the culture media in pig IVP does not improve reproductive performance of recipient mothers but could mitigate the impact of artificial procedures in the offspring.
Funder
Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España
Fundación Séneca
European Regional Development Fund
Universidad de Murcia
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Animal Science and Zoology,Biochemistry,Food Science,Biotechnology
Reference54 articles.
1. Viana J. IETS data retrieval committee. 2018 statistics of embryo production and transfer in domestic farm animals. Embryo Technol Newsl. 2019;37:7–25.
2. Maes D, Lopez Rodriguez A, Rijsselaere T, Vyt P, Van Soom A. Artificial insemination in pigs. In: Manafi M, editor. Artificial Insemination in Farm Animals. IntechOpen; 2011. https://doi.org/10.5772/16592.
3. Day BN. Reproductive biotechnologies: current status in porcine reproduction. Anim Reprod Sci. 2000;60–61:161–72.
4. Fowler KE, Mandawala AA, Griffin DK, Walling GA, Harvey SC. The production of pig preimplantation embryos in vitro: current progress and future prospects. Reprod Biol. 2018;18:203–11.
5. Sans P, Combris P. World meat consumption patterns: an overview of the last fifty years (1961–2011). Meat Sci. 2015;109:106–11.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献