Abstract
AbstractWhile an emerging literature considers Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as obligatory, voluntarism has dominated the scholarship and policymaking related to CSR. Almost parallel to this literature, the field of law has conceived and advanced the concept of Business and Human Rights (BHR) for addressing the human rights impacts of corporations. A new wave in the literature is exploring the relationship between these two disparate fields to bridge the corporate accountability gap. Contributing to this emerging debate, this paper develops a new CSR-BHR integrated framework that presents a unified approach towards corporate accountability. The new Framework offers a taxonomy of CSR-BHR strategies that firms can select from to prioritise their CSR-BHR activities for optimising their social contributions. It provides a new foundation for developing consistent policymaking on corporates’ social obligations across the world.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference96 articles.
1. Abah, A. L. (2016). Legal regulation of CSR: The case of social media and gender-based harassment. U Balt J Media L & Ethics, 5, 38.
2. Albareda, L., & Waddock, S. (2018). Networked CSR governance: A whole network approach to meta-governance. Business & Society, 57(4), 636–675.
3. Alves, I. M. (2009). Green Spin Everywhere: How Greenwashing Reveals The Limits Of The CSR Paradigm. Journal of Global Change & Governance, 2(1).
4. Amao, O. (2011). Corporate social responsibility, human rights and the law: Multinational corporations in developing countries. Taylor & Francis.
5. Amodu, N. (2021). Business and human rights versus corporate social responsibility: Integration for victim remedies. African Human Rights Law Journal, 21(2), 853–876.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献