Utility of visual rating scales in primary progressive aphasia

Author:

Falgàs Neus,Sacchi Luca,Carandini Tiziana,Montagut Nuria,Conte Giorgio,Triulzi Fabio,Galimberti Daniela,Arighi Andrea,Sanchez-Valle Raquel,Fumagalli Giorgio Giulio

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Differential diagnosis among subjects with Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA) can be challenging. Structural MRI can support the clinical profile. Visual rating scales are a simple and reliable tool to assess brain atrophy in the clinical setting. The aims of the study were to establish to what extent the visual rating scales could be useful in the differential diagnosis of PPA, to compare the clinical diagnostic impressions derived from routine MRI interpretations with those obtained using the visual rating scale and to correlate results of the scales in a voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis. Method Patients diagnosed with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) according to current criteria from two centers—Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico of Milan and Hospital Clínic de Barcelona—were included in the study. Two blinded clinicians evaluated the subjects MRIs for cortical atrophy and white matter hyperintensities using two protocols: routine readings and the visual rating scale. The diagnostic accuracy between patients and controls and within PPA subgroups were compared between the two protocols. Results One hundred fifty Subjects were studied. All the scales showed a good to excellent intra and inter-rater agreement. The left anterior temporal scale could differentiate between semantic PPA and all other variants. The rater impression after the protocol can increase the accuracy just for the logopenic PPA. In the VBM analysis, the scores of visual rating scales correlate with the corresponding area of brain atrophy. Conclusion The Left anterior temporal rating scale can distinguish semantic PPA from other variants. The rater impression after structured view improved the diagnostic accuracy of logopenic PPA compared to normal readings. The unstructured view of the MRI was reliable for identifying semantic PPA and controls. Neither the structured nor the unstructured view could identify the nonfluent and undetermined variants.

Funder

Instituto de Salud Carlos III

Alzheimer's Association

Ministero della Salute

Fondazione Gigi e Pupa Ferrari

Centro Dino Ferrari

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference23 articles.

1. Ashburner J. A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. NeuroImage. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.007.

2. Bisenius S, Mueller K, Diehl-Schmid J, Fassbender K, Grimmer T, Jessen F, Kassubek J, Kornhuber J, Landwehrmeyer B, Ludolph A, Schneider A, Anderl-Straub S, Stuke K, Danek A, Otto M, Schroeter ML. Predicting primary progressive aphasias with support vector machine approaches in structural MRI data. NeuroImage Clin. 2017;14:334–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2017.02.003.

3. Falgàs N, Balasa M, Bargalló N, Borrego-Écija S, Ramos-Campoy O, Fernández-Villullas G, Bosch B, Olives J, Tort-Merino A, Antonell A, Castellví M, Allen IE, Sánchez-Valle R, Lladó A. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI visual rating scales in the diagnosis of early onset cognitive impairment. J Alzheimer’s Disease. 2020;73:1575–83. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-191167.

4. Fazekas F, Chawluk JB, Zimmerma A, June M. MR Signal Abnormalities at 1. 5 T in Alzheimer’ s Dementia and Normal Aging deficiency; 1987.

5. Fumagalli GG, Basilico P, Arighi A, Bocchetta M, Dick KM, Cash DM, Harding S, Mercurio M, Fenoglio C, Pietroboni AM, Ghezzi L, Van Swieten J, Borroni B, De Mendonça A, Masellis M, Tartaglia MC, Rowe JB, Graff C, Tagliavini F, Frisoni GB, Laforce R, Finger E, Sorbi S, Scarpini E, Rohrer JD, Galimberti D. Distinct patterns of brain atrophy in genetic Frontotemporal Dementia Initiative (GENFI) cohort revealed by visual rating scales. Alzheimer’s Res Therapy. 2018;10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-018-0376-9.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3