Author:
de Kort Anna M.,Kuiperij H. Bea,Jäkel Lieke,Kersten Iris,Rasing Ingeborg,van Etten Ellis S.,van Rooden Sanneke,van Osch Matthias J. P.,Wermer Marieke J. H.,Terwindt Gisela M.,Schreuder Floris H. B. M.,Klijn Catharina J. M.,Verbeek Marcel M.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The diagnosis of probable cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is currently mostly based on characteristics of brain MRI. Blood biomarkers would be a cost-effective, easily accessible diagnostic method that may complement diagnosis by MRI and aid in monitoring disease progression. We studied the diagnostic potential of plasma Aβ38, Aβ40, and Aβ42 in patients with hereditary Dutch-type CAA (D-CAA) and sporadic CAA (sCAA).
Methods
All Aβ peptides were quantified in the plasma by immunoassays in a discovery cohort (11 patients with presymptomatic D-CAA and 24 patients with symptomatic D-CAA, and 16 and 24 matched controls, respectively) and an independent validation cohort (54 patients with D-CAA, 26 presymptomatic and 28 symptomatic, and 39 and 46 matched controls, respectively). In addition, peptides were quantified in the plasma in a group of 61 patients with sCAA and 42 matched controls. We compared Aβ peptide levels between patients and controls using linear regression adjusting for age and sex.
Results
In the discovery cohort, we found significantly decreased levels of all Aβ peptides in patients with presymptomatic D-CAA (Aβ38: p < 0.001; Aβ40: p = 0.009; Aβ42: p < 0.001) and patients with symptomatic D-CAA (Aβ38: p < 0.001; Aβ40: p = 0.01; Aβ42: p < 0.001) compared with controls. In contrast, in the validation cohort, plasma Aβ38, Aβ40, and Aβ42 were similar in patients with presymptomatic D-CAA and controls (Aβ38: p = 0.18; Aβ40: p = 0.28; Aβ42: p = 0.63). In patients with symptomatic D-CAA and controls, plasma Aβ38 and Aβ40 were similar (Aβ38: p = 0.14; Aβ40: p = 0.38), whereas plasma Aβ42 was significantly decreased in patients with symptomatic D-CAA (p = 0.033). Plasma Aβ38, Aβ40, and Aβ42 levels were similar in patients with sCAA and controls (Aβ38: p = 0.092; Aβ40: p = 0.64. Aβ42: p = 0.68).
Conclusions
Plasma Aβ42 levels, but not plasma Aβ38 and Aβ40, may be used as a biomarker for patients with symptomatic D-CAA. In contrast, plasma Aβ38, Aβ40, and Aβ42 levels do not appear to be applicable as a biomarker in patients with sCAA.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cognitive Neuroscience,Neurology (clinical),Neurology
Reference39 articles.
1. Jäkel L, De Kort AM, Klijn CJ, Schreuder FH, Verbeek MM. Prevalence of cerebral amyloid angiopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Alzheimers Dement. 2022;181(1):10–28.
2. Bakker E, van Broeckhoven C, Haan J, Voorhoeve E, van Hul W, Levy E, et al. DNA diagnosis for hereditary cerebral hemorrhage with amyloidosis (Dutch type). Am J Hum Genet. 1991;49(3):518–21.
3. Biffi A. Main features of hereditary cerebral amyloid angiopathies: a systematic review. Cereb Circ Cogn Behav. 2022;3:100–24.
4. Charidimou A, Boulouis G, Frosch MP, Baron J-C, Pasi M, Albucher JF, et al. The Boston criteria version 2.0 for cerebral amyloid angiopathy: a multicentre, retrospective, MRI-neuropathology diagnostic accuracy study. Lancet Neurol. 2022;21(8):714–25.
5. Verbeek MM, Kremer BPH, Rikkert MO, Van Domburg PHMF, Skehan ME, Greenberg SM. Cerebrospinal fluid amyloid β40 is decreased in cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Ann Neurol. 2009;66(2):245–9.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献