Author:
Klingenberg Malte,Stark Didem,Eitel Fabian,Budding Céline,Habes Mohamad,Ritter Kerstin,
Abstract
AbstractIntroductionAlthough machine learning classifiers have been frequently used to detect Alzheimer’s disease (AD) based on structural brain MRI data, potential bias with respect to sex and age has not yet been addressed. Here, we examine a state-of-the-art AD classifier for potential sex and age bias even in the case of balanced training data.MethodsBased on an age- and sex-balanced cohort of 432 subjects (306 healthy controls, 126 subjects with AD) extracted from the ADNI data base, we trained a convolutional neural network to detect AD in MRI brain scans and performed ten different random training-validation-test splits to increase robustness of the results. Classifier decisions for single subjects were explained using layer-wise relevance propagation.ResultsThe classifier performed significantly better for women (balanced accuracy$$87.58\pm 1.14\%$$87.58±1.14%) than for men ($$79.05\pm 1.27\%$$79.05±1.27%). No significant differences were found in clinical AD scores, ruling out a disparity in disease severity as a cause for the performance difference. Analysis of the explanations revealed a larger variance in regional brain areas for male subjects compared to female subjects.DiscussionThe identified sex differences cannot be attributed to an imbalanced training dataset and therefore point to the importance of examining and reporting classifier performance across population subgroups to increase transparency and algorithmic fairness. Collecting more data especially among underrepresented subgroups and balancing the dataset are important but do not always guarantee a fair outcome.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Brain & Behavior Research Foundation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cognitive Neuroscience,Neurology (clinical),Neurology
Reference59 articles.
1. Payan A, Montana G. Predicting Alzheimer’s disease: a neuroimaging study with 3D convolutional neural networks. arXiv preprint. 2015. ArXiv:1502.02506.
2. Wen J, Thibeau-Sutre E, Diaz-Melo M, Samper-González J, Routier A, Bottani S, et al. Convolutional neural networks for classification of Alzheimer’s disease: Overview and reproducible evaluation. Med Image Anal. 2020;63:101694.
3. Klöppel S, Stonnington CM, Barnes J, Chen F, Chu C, Good CD, et al. Accuracy of dementia diagnosis—a direct comparison between radiologists and a computerized method. Brain. 2008;131(11):2969–74.
4. Böhle M, Eitel F, Weygandt M, Ritter K. Layer-wise relevance propagation for explaining deep neural network decisions in MRI-based Alzheimer’s disease classification. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019;11:194.
5. Nowogrodzki A. Inequality in medicine. Nature. 2017;550(7674):S18–9.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献