Author:
Aagaard Lise,Hansen Ebba Holme
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) has traditionally been the sole province of healthcare professionals. In the European Union, more countries have allowed consumers to report ADRs directly to the regulatory agencies. The aim of this study was to characterize ADRs reported by European consumer for nervous system medications.
Methods
ADRs reported by consumers for nervous system medications (ATC group N) from 2007 to 2011 and located in the European ADR database, EudraVigilance, were analysed. Data were categorized with respect to age and sex, category and seriousness of reported ADRs and medications. The unit of analysis was one ADR.
Results
We located 4766 ADRs reported for nervous system medications, and one half of these were serious including 19 deaths. Less than 5% of ADRs were reported in children. Totally, 58% of ADRs were reported for women, 42% for men. The majority of reported ADRs were of the types “nervous system disorders” (18% of total ADRs) followed by “psychiatric disorders” (18% of total ADRs) and “general disorders” (15% of total ADRs) which also were the system organ classes in which the majority of serious ADRs were found. ADR reports encompassed medicines from the therapeutic groups: antiepileptics (ATC group N03) (36% of total ADRs), parasympathomimetics (ATC group N07) (22% of total ADRs) and antidepressants ATC group N06A (9% of total ADRs). Antiepileptics were the therapeutic group with the highest share of serious ADRs (60%) followed by antidepressants (15%). Many serious ADRs were reported for pregabalin and varenicline.
Conclusions
The majority of ADRs from nervous system mediations reported by consumers that were identified from the EudraVigilance database were serious. The value of consumer reports in pharmacovigilance still remains unclarified.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology
Reference22 articles.
1. van Hunsel F, Härmark L, Pal S, Olsson S, van Grootheest K: Experiences with adverse drug reaction reporting by patients: an 11-country survey. van Hunsel F, Härmark L, Pal S, Olsson S, van Grootheest K. Drug Saf. 2012, 35: 45-60. 10.2165/11594320-000000000-00000.
2. Blenkinsopp A, Wilkie P, Wang M, Routledge PA: Patient reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions: a review of published literature and international experience. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006, 63: 148-156.
3. Hawcutt DB, Mainie P, Riordan A, Smyth RL, Pirmohamed M: Reported paediatric adverse drug reactions in the UK 2000–2009. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012, 73: 437-446. 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04113.x.
4. Durrieu G, Palmaro A, Pourcel L, Caillet C, Faucher A, Jacquet A, Ouaret S, Perault-Pochat MC, Kreft-Jais C, Castot A, Lapeyre-Mestre M, Montastruc J: First French experience of ADR reporting by patients after a mass immunization campaign with Influenza A (H1N1) pandemic vaccines: a comparison of reports submitted by patients and healthcare professionals. Drug Saf. 2012, 35: 845-854.
5. Medawar C, Herxheimer A: A comparison of adverse drug reactions from professionals and users, relating to risk of dependence and suicidal behaviour with paroxetine. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2004, 16: 5-19.
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献