Author:
Baptista Lara,Berning Björn,Curto Manuel,Waeschenbach Andrea,Meimberg Harald,Santos António M.,Ávila Sérgio P.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
As in most bryozoans, taxonomy and systematics of species in the genus Reteporella Busk, 1884 (family Phidoloporidae) has hitherto almost exclusively been based on morphological characters. From the central North Atlantic Azores Archipelago, nine Reteporella species have historically been reported, none of which have as yet been revised. Aiming to characterise the diversity and biogeographic distribution of Azorean Reteporella species, phylogenetic reconstructions were conducted on a dataset of 103 Azorean Reteporella specimens, based on the markers cytochrome C oxidase subunit 1, small and large ribosomal RNA subunits. Morphological identification was based on scanning electron microscopy and complemented the molecular inferences.
Results
Our results reveal two genetically distinct Azorean Reteporella clades, paraphyletic to eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean taxa. Moreover, an overall concordance between morphological and molecular species can be shown, and the actual bryozoan diversity in the Azores is greater than previously acknowledged as the dataset comprises three historically reported species and four putative new taxa, all of which are likely to be endemic. The inclusion of Mediterranean Reteporella specimens also revealed new species in the Adriatic and Ligurian Sea, whilst the inclusion of additional phidoloporid taxa hints at the non-monophyly of the genus Reteporella.
Conclusion
Being the first detailed genetic study on the genus Reteporella, the high divergence levels inferred within the genus Reteporella and family Phidoloporidae calls for the need of further revision. Nevertheless, the overall concordance between morphospecies and COI data suggest the potential adequacy of a 3% cut-off to distinguish Reteporella species. The discovery of new species in the remote Azores Archipelago as well as in the well-studied Mediterranean Sea indicates a general underestimation of bryozoan diversity. This study constitutes yet another example of the importance of integrative taxonomical approaches on understudied taxa, contributing to cataloguing genetic and morphological diversity.
Funder
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
SYNTHESYS+ Project by European Community Research Infrastructure Action
Porcupine Marine Natural History Society
International Bryozoology Association
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference115 articles.
1. Hayward PJ, Winston JE. Bryozoa collected by the United States Antarctic Research Program: new taxa and new records. J Nat Hist. 2011;45:2259–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2011.574922
2. Bock P. World List of Bryozoa. Phidoloporidae Gabb & Horn, 1862. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=110768 on 2022-01-05. 2022.
3. Hayward P, Ryland J. Cheilostomatous Bryozoa. Part 2. Hippothooidea–Celleporoidea. In: Barnes R, Crothers J, editors. Synopses of the British Fauna (New Series). London: Field Studies Council; 1999. pp. 1–416.
4. Hayward PJ. Lace corals (Bryozoa: Phidoloporidae) from Australia and the tropical south-west Pacific. J Zool Soc London. 2000;252:109–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2000.tb00825.x
5. Casoli E, Piazzi L, Nicoletti L, Jona-Lasinio G, Cecchi E, Mancini G, et al. Ecology, distribution and demography of erect bryozoans in Mediterranean coralligenous reefs. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2020;235:106573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2019.106573
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献