Accuracy and precision of dried urine spot method for the detection of Schistosoma mansoni circulating cathodic antigens in resource-limited settings

Author:

Zacharia AbdallahORCID,Kinabo Clemence,Makene Twilumba,Omary Huda,Ogweno George,Lyamuya Faraja,Ngasala Billy

Abstract

Abstract Background The World Health Organization recommends the use of Schisto point-of-care circulating cathodic antigens (Schisto POC-CCA) for screening of Schistosoma mansoni as it offers better sensitivity than microscopy. However, there are limitation facing the use of this method including timely availability of the test cassettes. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability of dried urine spot (DUS) method for collection of urine and detection of S. mansoni using Schisto POC-CCA cassettes in a resource-limited settings. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted between October and November 2022 among 250 primary school children in Sengerema District, northwestern Tanzania. S. mansoni CCA was detected in filter paper-based DUS, liquid urine using DUS Schisto POC-CCA (index), and direct urine Schisto POC-CCA (comparator) methods respectively. S. mansoni eggs in stool were detected using duplicate Kato-Katz (KK) method. The measures of accuracy were computed and compared between the index and comparator methods. The strength of agreement between inter-raters precisions was tested using Cohen’s kappa (k). Results This study revealed S. mansoni prevalence rates of 28.8%, 54.0% and 50.8% by duplicate KK, direct urine Schisto POC-CCA and DUS Schisto POC-CCA methods respectively. The mean intensity of infection among infected participants was 86.3 eggs per gram of stool (EPG) ranging from 12.0 EPG to 824.0 EPG. The sensitivity of DUS Schisto POC-CCA and direct urine Schisto POC-CCA was 94.44% (95% CI: 89.15–99.74%) and 97.22% (95% CI: 93.43–100.00%) respectively. The DUS Schisto POC-CCA method had slightly higher specificity (66.85%) than direct urine Schisto POC-CCA method (63.48%). The accuracy of the DUS Schisto POC-CCA was found to be slightly high (74.80%, 95% CI: 68.94–79.06%) compared to that of direct urine Schisto POC-CCA (73.20%, 95% CI: 67.25–78.59%). There was good agreement between two laboratory technologists who performed the DUS Schisto POC-CCA method on similar samples (k = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.59–0.95). Conclusions The DUS Schisto POC-CCA method had comparable S. mansoni detection accuracy to direct urine Schisto POC-CCA. This suggests that the method could be a potential alternative to direct urine Schisto POC-CCA for screening S. mansoni in resource-limited situations. Graphical Abstract

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference35 articles.

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. World NTD Day 2023: following the diagnostic development pathway to better health. https://www.cdc.gov/globalhealth/ntd/features/NTD_feature_2023.html. Accessed 19 Oct 2023.

2. World Health Organization. Innovations in diagnostics: a priority area. https://www.who.int/teams/control-of-neglected-tropical-diseases/interventions/research. Accessed 19 Oct 2023.

3. Weerakoon KGAD, Gobert GN, Cai P, McManus DP. Advances in the diagnosis of human schistosomiasis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28(4):939–67.

4. Danso-Appiah A, Minton J, Boamah D, Otchere J, Asmah RH, Rodgers M, et al. Accuracy of point-of-care testing for circulatory cathodic antigen in the detection of schistosome infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2016;94(7):522A-A533.

5. Coalition for Operational Research on Neglected Tropical Diseases. Developing a M & E framework for schistosomiasis and prioritizing operational research to achieve schistosomiasis elimination: Meeting Report 22 December 2020. Decatur: Coalition for Operational Research on Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2021.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3