Author:
Chen Hongwei,Wu Lijun,Zheng Rongmei,Liu Yan,Li Yang,Ding Zihai
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Although percutaneous posterior-ring tension-band metallic plate and percutaneous iliosacral screws are used to fix unstable posterior pelvic ring fractures, the biomechanical stability and compatibility of both internal fixation techniques for the treatment of Denis I, II and III type vertical sacral fractures remain unclear.
Methods
Using CT and MR images of the second generation of Chinese Digitized Human “male No. 23”, two groups of finite element models were developed for Denis I, II and III type vertical sacral fractures with ipsilateral superior and inferior pubic ramus fractures treated with either a percutaneous metallic plate or a percutaneous screw. Accordingly, two groups of clinical cases that were fixed using the above-mentioned two internal fixation techniques were retrospectively evaluated to compare postoperative effect and function. Parallel analysis was performed with a finite element model controlled trial and a case control study.
Results
The difference of the postoperative Majeed standards and outcome rates between two case groups was no statistically significant (P > 0.05). Accordingly, the high values of the maximum displacements/stresses of the plate-fixation model group approximated those of the screw-fixation model group. However, further simulation of Denis I, II and III type fractures in each group of models found that the biomechanics of the plate-fixation models became increasingly stable and compatible, whereas the biomechanics of the screw-fixation models maintained tiny fluctuations. When treating Denis III fractures, the biomechanical effects of the pelvic ring of the plate-fixation model were better than the screw-fixation model.
Conclusions
Percutaneous plate and screw fixations are both appropriate for the treatment of Denis I and II type vertical sacral fractures; whereas percutaneous plate fixation appears be superior to percutaneous screw fixation for Denis III type vertical sacral fracture. Biomechanical evidence of finite element evaluations combined with clinical evidence will contribute to our ability to distinguish between indications that require plate or screw fixation for vertical sacral fractures.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Rheumatology
Reference29 articles.
1. Vaccaro AR, Kim DH, Brodke DS, Harris M, Chapman JR, Schildhauer T, Routt ML, Sasso RC: Diagnosis and management of sacral spine fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004, 86: 166-175.
2. Taguchi T, Kawai S, Kaneko K, Yugue D: Operative management of displaced fractures of the sacrum. J Ortho Sci. 1999, 4: 342-352. 10.1007/s007760050114.
3. Denis F, Davis S, Comfort T: Sacral fractures: an important problem (retrospective analysis of 236 cases). Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988, 227: 67-81.
4. Jia J, Wang J, He Y, Li X, Ma B, Zhang T, Pei F: Surgical treatment of unstable pelvic injury with displaced sacral fractures. Chin J Orthop. 2009, 29: 1109-1116.
5. Tile M: Pelvic ring fractures: should they be fixed?. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988, 70-B: 1-12.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献