Efficacy and safety of fixed dose combination of Sitagliptin, metformin, and pioglitazone in type 2 Diabetes (IMPACT study): a randomized controlled trial
-
Published:2024-02-10
Issue:1
Volume:10
Page:
-
ISSN:2055-8260
-
Container-title:Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Clin Diabetes Endocrinol
Author:
Aashish Mondal, Arindam Naskar, Siddiqi Sheelu Shafiq, Bhosle Deepak, Mallikarjuna V. J., Amol Dange, Sanket Sorate, Omkar Gavali, Parth Patel, Dhruvi Hasnani, Durga Prasad, Pradeep Dalwadi, Suresh Kumar, Vaishali Pathak, Mayura Chaudhari, Indraneel Basu, Jayashri Shembalkar, Arif Fariooqui, Raghavendra S. K., Deepak Varade, Ravindra Thakkar, Shaishav Bhanushali, Vijay Gaikwad, Khan Kamran, Mahajani V. V., Sharma A. D., Mayabhate MayurORCID, Pawar R. R., Aiwale A. S., Vinayaka Shahavi
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Due to the progressive decline in β-cell function, it is often necessary to utilize multiple agents with complementary mechanisms of action to address various facets and achieve glycemic control. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of metformin/sitagliptin/pioglitazone (MSP) therapy vs. metformin/sitagliptin (MS) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
Methods
In this phase 3, multicenter, double-blind study, patients with T2DM who exhibited inadequate glycemic control with HbA1c of 8.0–11.0% while taking ≥1500 mg/day metformin for at least 6 weeks were randomized to receive either FDC of MSP (1000/100/15 mg) or MS (1000/100 mg) per day for 24 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the change in HbA1c, and secondary outcomes included changes in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial plasma glucose (PPG), and body weight from baseline to 24 weeks along with safety and tolerability.
Results
Among the 236 patients randomized, 207 (87.71%) successfully completed the study. All baseline characteristics were comparable between the FDC of MSP and MS groups. There was a subsequent significant reduction of HbA1c in FDC of MSP (− 1.64) vs. MS (− 1.32); between groups was [− 0.32% (95% CI, − 0.59, − 0.05)], P = 0.0208. Similar reductions were found in FPG [− 13.2 mg/dL (95% CI, − 22.86, − 3.71)], P = 0.0068, and PPG [− 20.83 mg/dL (95% CI, − 34.11, − 7.55)], P = 0.0023. There were no significant changes in body weight. A total of 27 adverse effects (AEs) and one severe AE were reported, none of which were related to the study drug.
Conclusion
The FDC of MSP demonstrated significant efficacy in managing glycemic indices and could serve as a valuable tool for physicians in the management of Indian patients with T2DM.
Trial registration
Clinical Trials Registry of India, CTRI/2021/10/037461.
Funder
Alkem Laboratories Ltd Mumbai
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference28 articles.
1. Kalra S, Das AK, Priya G, Ghosh S, Mehrotra RN, Das S, et al. Fixed-dose combination in management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: expert opinion from an international panel. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9(11):5450–7. 2. IDF Diabetes Atlas, tenth edition. 2022. Accessed: Nov. 10, 2023. https://diabetesatlas.org/. 3. DeFronzo RA, Eldor R, Abdul-Ghani M. Pathophysiologic approach to therapy in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(2):S127–38. 4. Galicia-Garcia U, Benito-Vicente A, Jebari S, Larrea-Sebal A, Siddiqi H, Uribe KB, et al. Pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(17):6275. 5. Turner RC, Cull CA, Frighi V, Holman RR. Glycemic control with diet, sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: progressive requirement for multiple therapies (UKPDS 49). UK prospective Diabetes study (UKPDS) group. JAMA. 1999;281:2005–12.
|
|