Abstract
AbstractThe basement of the Tokyo metropolitan area consists of the Miocene–Pleistocene forearc basin fills that are well exposed around Tokyo Bay, especially on the Miura and Boso peninsulas. The forearc basin fills on these two peninsulas are called the Miura and Kazusa groups, and they were deposited during the late Miocene–Pliocene and Pliocene–middle Pleistocene, respectively. Because many biostratigraphic datum planes, paleomagnetic reversal events, and other chronostratigraphic tools are available for these deposits, they provide the “type stratigraphy” of other equivalent sedimentary sequences on the Japanese islands and in the northwest Pacific. However, the use of such stratigraphic markers has not been fully applied to understand the architecture of a basin-wide unconformity between the Miura and Kazusa groups called the Kurotaki unconformity. For our study, we made correlations among the Pliocene vitric tephra beds based on their stratigraphic levels, lithologic characteristics, the chemical compositions of glass shards, and calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy. As a result, we were able to correlate tephra beds Ng-Ky25 just above the C3n.3n normal subchronozone (4.7 Ma), IkT16-An157.5 and IkT19-An158.5 near the top of the Mammoth reverse polarity subchronozone (3.21 Ma), and Ahn-Onr (2.6–2.7 Ma) across Tokyo Bay on the Miura and Boso peninsulas. We were able to recognize erosional surfaces and coeval mass-transport deposits immediately below the top of the Mammoth reverse polarity subchronozone, which suggests that submarine landslide(s) may have produced the lack of stratigraphic horizons (4.5–3.2 Ma) in the Miura and eastern Boso regions. Basal pebbly sandstone beds pervasively cover the erosional surfaces, and they show lateral variations into the thick (up to 60 m) mass-transport deposits and overlying turbidite sandstones. The lateral variations in sediment thickness of the post-failure deposits suggest that the basin-wide erosion was associated with the initial growth of a basin-bounding structural high that separates two distinct sub-basins in the forearc basin, which resulted in the subsequent onlapping deposition in the earliest stage of the Kazusa forearc basin. The basin-wide erosion marks the initiation of tectonic reconfigurations that led to segmentation of the forearc basin around the Tokyo Bay region.
Funder
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference143 articles.
1. Akamine H, Iwai S, Koike K, Naruse Y, Ogose S, Omori M, Seki Y, Suzuki K, Watanabe K (1956) Geology of the miura peninsula. Earth Sci (chikyu Kagaku) 30:1–18 (in Japanese with English abstract)
2. Angelier J, Huchon P (1987) Tectonic record of convergence changes in a collision area: the Boso and Miura peninsulas, central Japan. Earth Plan Sci Lett 81:397–408
3. Asao K, Ito T (2011) Seismic reflection profile of the Kazusa-Shimosa group across the central Boso Peninsula, Japan. Abstract S3-O-4 presented at joint annual meeting of Japan Assoc Miner Sci and Geol Soc Japan 2011 (in Japanese)
4. Chiba Prefecture (2004) Report of Seismic geological survey in chiba prefecture. chiba prefecture, Japan (in Japanese)
5. Chiyonobu S, Sato T, Ishikawa K, Yamasaki M (2007) Uppermost Cenozoic calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy of the hotspring wells located in the central part of Tokyo, Japan. J Geol Soc Japan 113:223–232 (in Japanese with English abstract)