An introductory review of the thermal structure of subduction zones: II—numerical approach and validation
-
Published:2023-11-30
Issue:1
Volume:10
Page:
-
ISSN:2197-4284
-
Container-title:Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Prog Earth Planet Sci
Author:
Wilson Cian R., van Keken Peter E.ORCID
Abstract
AbstractThe thermal structure of subduction zones is fundamental to our understanding of the physical and chemical processes that occur at active convergent plate margins. These include magma generation and related arc volcanism, shallow and deep seismicity, and metamorphic reactions that can release fluids. Computational models can predict the thermal structure to great numerical precision when models are fully described but this does not guarantee accuracy or applicability. In a trio of companion papers, the construction of thermal subduction zone models, their use in subduction zone studies, and their link to geophysical and geochemical observations are explored. In this part II, the finite element techniques that can be used to predict thermal structure are discussed in an introductory fashion along with their verification and validation.Steady-state thermal structure for the updated subduction zone benchmark. a) Temperature predicted by TF for case 1; b) temperature difference between TF and Sepran using the penalty function (PF) method for case 1 at fm=1 where fm represents the smallest element sizes in the finite element grids near the coupling point; c) slab top temperature comparison for case 1; and d)–f) as a)–c) but now for case 2. The star indicates the position or temperature conditions at the coupling point.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference44 articles.
1. Alnæs MS, Logg A, Ölgaard KB, Rognes ME, Wells GN (2014) Unified form language: a domain-specific language for weak formulations of partial differential equations. ACM Trans Math Softw 40:1–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/2566630 2. Alnæs MS, Blechta J, Hake J, Johansson A, Kehlet B, Logg A, Richardson C, Ring J, Rognes ME, Wells GN (2015) The FEniCS project version 1.5. Arch Num Softw 3:9–23. https://doi.org/10.11588/ans.2015.100.20553 3. Auricchio F, Beirão da Veiga L, Brezzi F, Lovadina C (2017) Mixed finite element methods. In: Stein E, Borst R, Hughes TJR (eds) Encyclopedia of computational mechanics, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, pp 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119176817.ecm2004 4. Balay S, Abhyankar S, Adams MF, Benson S, Brown J, Brune P, Buschelman K, Constantinescu EM, Dalcin L, Dener A, Eijkhout V, Faibussowitsch J, Gropp WD, Hapla V, Isaac T, Jolivet P, Karpeev D, Kaushik D, Knepley MG, Kong F, Kruger S, May DA, McInnes LC, Mills RT, Mitchell L, Munson T, Roman JE, Rupp K, Sanan P, Sarich J, Smith BF, Zampini S, Zhang H, Zhang H, Zhang J (2023) PETSc Web page. https://petsc.org/ 5. Batchelor GK (1967) An introduction to fluid dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|